DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Augustine, 215 So. 2d 634.

44 citing documents.

  • State v. Robinson 811 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
    State v. Augustine, [ , ].
  • State v. Davis 677 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    988 , (1968); State v. White, 247 La.
  • State v. Dixon 668 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    See, State v. Augustine, [ , (1968) ] supra; Robey, Criteria for Competency to Stand Trial: A Checklist for Psychiatrists, 122 Am.J.
  • State v. Green 632 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    See, State v. Augustine, [ , (1968)] supra; Robey, Criteria for Competency to Stand Trial: A Checklist for Psychiatrists, 122 Am.J.
  • State v. Bibb 626 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Jackson 600 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
    See, State v. Augustine, supra [ , (1968) ]; Robey, Criteria for Competency to Stand Trial: A Checklist for Psychiatrists, 122 Am.J.
  • State v. Gurley 565 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
    See, State v. Augustine, supra [ , (1968) ]; Robey, Criteria for Competency to Stand Trial: A Checklist for Psychiatrists, 122 Am.J.
  • State v. Dean 528 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Comeaux 514 So. 2d 84 La. 1987
  • State v. Scott 490 So. 2d 472 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Freeman 482 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    “A conclusion that one is mentally retarded or defective or diseased does not of itself establish present insanity.” , (1968).
  • State v. Cottingin 476 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Collatt 477 So. 2d 177 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    See, State v. Augustine, supra [ , (1968)]; Robey, Criteria for Competency to Stand Trial: A Checklist for Psychiatrists, 122 Am.J.
  • State v. Hardeman 467 So. 2d 1163 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Elliott 467 So. 2d 1144 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Bennett 457 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    In State v. Augustine, [ ], (1968), the Supreme Court held that only that which is in the record may be reviewed, and it is the obligation of the appellant to bring his appeal property (sic) before the court.
  • State v. Felo 454 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    See, State v. Augustine, supra [ , (1968)]; Robey, Criteria for Competency to Stand Trial : A Checklist for Psychiatrists, 122 Am.J.
  • State v. Williams 454 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Charles 450 So. 2d 1287 La. 1984
  • State v. Booth 448 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
  • State v. Whorton 440 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    See also, , (1968), and State v. Hilaire, 216 La.
  • State v. Robinson 423 So. 2d 1053 La. 1982
    Although the requirement of identity of issues between the former proceeding and the trial on the merits may be required, , (1968), this Court has interpreted that identity pursuant to sections of McCormick [6] and Wharton [7] to mean only a "substantial" identity of issues.
  • State v. Oubichon 422 So. 2d 1140 La. 1982
  • State v. Brown 414 So. 2d 689 La. 1982
    See, State v. Augustine [ , (1968)]; Robey, Criteria for Competency to Stand Trial: A Checklist for Psychiatrists, 122 Am.J.
  • State v. Williams 381 So. 2d 439 La. 1980
  • State v. Reaves 376 So. 2d 136 La. 1979
    (1968); State v. White, 247 La.
  • State v. Coco 371 So. 2d 803 La. 1979
    Mere weakness of mentality or subnormal intelligence does not of itself constitute legal insanity, , (1968), but when mental retardation, alone or in combination with a mental disease or defect, is so severe as to impair a defendant's capacity to understand the object, nature and consequences of the proceedings against him, to consult with counsel in a meaningful way, and to assist rationally in his d
  • State v. Collins 370 So. 2d 533 La. 1979
    See, State v. Augustine, [ , ] supra ; Robey, Criteria for Competency to Stand Trial: A Checklist for Psychiatrists, 122 Am.J.
  • State v. Lawrence 368 So. 2d 699 La. 1979
    State v. Morris, supra; , (1968).
  • State v. Weber 364 So. 2d 952 La. 1978
    State v. Bennett, supra ; , (1968).
  • State v. Bennett 345 So. 2d 1129 La. 1977
    State v. Morris, supra; State v. Hargrove, La., (1976); , (1968).
  • State v. Sylvester 343 So. 2d 1020 La. 1977
    Secondly, defendant argues that, as a matter of law, testimony transcribed at a , (1968) a transcript is inadmissible in this situation.
  • State v. Morris 340 So. 2d 195 La. 1976
  • State v. Welch 337 So. 2d 1114 La. 1976
  • State v. Jones 325 So. 2d 235 La. 1976
  • State v. Veal 326 So. 2d 329 La. 1976
  • State v. Flores 315 So. 2d 772 La. 1975
    (1968); State v. Yaun, 237 La.
  • State v. Sam 283 So. 2d 81 La. 1973
    (1968), we must reverse.
  • State v. Dickerson 282 So. 2d 456 La. 1973
  • State v. Landry 271 So. 2d 517 La. 1973
  • State v. Hall 262 So. 2d 498 La. 1972
  • State v. Edwards 243 So. 2d 806 La. 1971
    as authority for a holding contrary to that of the trial judge.
  • State v. Callihan 242 So. 2d 521 La. 1970
  • State v. Hampton 218 So. 2d 311 La. 1969
    State v. Rogers, 241 La.