Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite McCauley v. Manda Brothers Provisions Company, 211 So. 2d 637.
-
TERESE LANDRY VERSUS JOEY'S, INC. D/B/A JOEY'S SPECIALTY FOOD
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
402, (1967), aff’d, So.2d 637 (1968)).
-
Landry v. Joey's, Inc.
261 So. 3d 112
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
402 , (1967), aff'd , , (1968) ).
-
John Foster, Jr. v. Afc Enterprises, Inc., Et Ux.
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2005
402, (1967), affirmed, So.2d 637 (1968)).
-
Foster v. AFC Enterprises, Inc.
896 So. 2d 293
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
402 , (1967), affirmed, , (1968)).
-
Swindell v. Leonard B. Hebert, Jr. & Co.
592 So. 2d 483
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
1st Cir.1967), aff'd, , (1968).
- Pennison v. Pennison 542 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
-
Ard v. Kraft, Inc.
540 So. 2d 1172
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1st Cir.1967), affirmed, , (1968).
- Fleishmann v. Fleishmann 538 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
-
Jackson v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.
439 So. 2d 1147
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
1st Cir.1967) affirmed , (1968).
-
Horowitz v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Supermarkets, Inc.
376 So. 2d 603
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
1st Cir. 1967), affirmed, , stated that a retailer cannot be held responsible to a plaintiff on a theory of implied warranty absent a showing that the retailer knew or should have known that the product sold is unwholesome.
-
Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
370 So. 2d 202
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
1st Cir. 1967), affirmed , (1968).
-
Demars v. Natchitoches Coca-Cola Bottling Co.
353 So. 2d 433
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
1st Cir. 1967), affd., , (1968); Reid v. Clearfield Cheese Company, Inc., (La.App.
-
Reid v. Clearfield Cheese Company, Inc.
307 So. 2d 115
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
1st Cir. 1967), affirmed, , (1968).
-
Cartwright v. Firemen's Ins. Co. of Newark, NJ
223 So. 2d 822
La. 1969
denied, and McCauley v. Manda Brothers Provisions Company, Inc., La.App., , affirmed in , ), as well as the lia *339 bility of the owner of domestic animals, despite the specific language of Revised Civil Code Article 2321, which has also been read in connection with Civil Code Articles 2315 and 2316.