Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Richardson v. Tate, 269 So. 2d 278.

18 citing documents.

McLeod v. Moore 7 So. 3d 190 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
In support of their argument that Moore was a borrowed servant, (La.App.
Hubert v. Martin 572 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Moon v. City of Baton Rouge 522 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
267 (E.D.La.1983), , (La.App.
Lee v. K-Mart Corp. 483 So. 2d 609 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Blancher v. Samuels 354 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
4th Cir. 1972, ; or b) L. Murphy Trucking Service, Inc., under the theory that once Samuels left in H & M's truck # 83 from its yard and arrived at the Murphy sandpit, he was under the control and supervision of Murphy in all of his activities, and was effectively working for Murphy in the completion of its contractual obligatio
O'DONNELL v. Fidelity General Ins. Co. 344 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
4th Cir. 1975); (La.App.
Trinity Universal Insurance v. Mallard Truck Lines, Inc. 340 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Highlands Insurance Co. v. LJ Denny and Son 328 So. 2d 779 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
McCutchen v. Fruge, supra; (La.App.
Ogaard v. Wiley 325 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Glazer v. Louisiana Trailer Sales, Inc. 313 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Locascio v. Lake Terrace Center, Inc. 293 So. 2d 510 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Cambrice v. Fern Supply Co., Inc. 285 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
Hislop Plumbing Company, Inc. v. Pogue-Atkins, Inc. 283 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
4th Cir. 1972; writs refused 1973) and McCutchen v. Fruge (La.App.
Lambert v. James A. Teague Rental Equipment, Inc. 278 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Corp., B & G Crane Service v. Thomas W. Hooley & Sons, 227 La.
Richardson v. Tate 271 So. 2d 260 La. 1973
Ostarly v. Tate 271 So. 2d 261 La. 1973
Schayer v. Tate 271 So. 2d 261 La. 1973
Richardson v. Tate 271 So. 2d 261 La. 1973