Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Comeaux, 211 So. 2d 620.
-
State v. Ferguson
358 So. 2d 1214
La. 1978
768 , (1972); , (1968); and a third party holding common authority over, or other relationship to, the premises or effects sought to be inspected may consent to a search.
-
State v. Cole
337 So. 2d 1067
La. 1976
654 (1921); , (1968); State v. Page, 251 La.
-
State v. Mims
330 So. 2d 905
La. 1976
State v. Rogers, supra ; , (1968).
-
State v. Wyatt
327 So. 2d 401
La. 1976
707 , (1971); , (1968); State v. Gregoire, 249 La.
- State v. Sneed 328 So. 2d 126 La. 1976
- State v. Rogers 324 So. 2d 403 La. 1975
-
State v. Sears
298 So. 2d 814
La. 1974
(1968); State v. Page, 251 La.
-
State v. Washington
292 So. 2d 234
La. 1974
485 , 19 L.Ed.2d 495 ; , (1968); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
-
State v. Washington
292 So. 2d 234
La. 1974
485 , 19 L.Ed.2d 495 ; , (1968); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
-
State v. Stevenson
292 So. 2d 488
La. 1974
485 , 19 L.Ed.2d 495 ; , (1968); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
-
State v. Meichel
290 So. 2d 878
La. 1974
(1968); State v. Page, 251 La.
-
State v. Edwards
287 So. 2d 518
La. 1973
919 , (1970); , (1968); State v. Dees, 252 La.
-
State v. Womack
283 So. 2d 708
La. 1973
485 , 19 L.Ed.2d 495 ; , (1968); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
- State v. Taylor 282 So. 2d 491 La. 1973
-
Overruled
State v. Scott
278 So. 2d 121
La. 1973
(1968), we upheld the requirement, that a person be able to read and write the English language to be qualified for jury service, against an attack that the requirement was discriminatory and prejudicial, depriving the accused of a jury representing a fair cross section of the local population.
-
State v. Enloe
276 So. 2d 283
La. 1973
485 , 19 L.Ed.2d 495 ; , (1968); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
-
State v. Washington
272 So. 2d 355
La. 1973
919 , (1970); , (1968); State v. Clifton, 247 La.
-
State v. Washington
272 So. 2d 355
La. 1973
919 , (1970); , (1968); State v. Clifton, 247 La.
-
State v. Rollins
271 So. 2d 519
La. 1973
84 , (1971); , (1968); State v. Reese, 250 La.
-
Doyle v. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
266 So. 2d 541
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
84 , (1971); , (1968); State v. Reese, 250 La.
-
State v. Daniels
263 So. 2d 859
La. 1972
485 , 19 L.Ed.2d 495 ; , (1968); State v. Pratt, 255 La.
-
State v. McDaniel
264 So. 2d 587
La. 1972
211 So.2d *633 620 (1968).
-
State v. Curry
263 So. 2d 36
La. 1972
91 , (1969); , (1968); State ex rel.
- State v. Hubbs 259 So. 2d 53 La. 1972
-
State v. Nelson
259 So. 2d 46
La. 1972
(1968); State v. Gregoire, 249 La.
- State v. Cooley 257 So. 2d 400 La. 1972
-
State v. Millsap
248 So. 2d 324
La. 1971
919 , (1970); , 211 So.2d (320 (1968); State v. Clifton, supra.
- State v. Sinclair 245 So. 2d 365 La. 1971
-
State v. Alexander
233 So. 2d 891
La. 1970
Hoyt v. State of Florida, 368 U.S. 57, 82 S.Ct.
-
State v. Pratt
233 So. 2d 883
La. 1970
*934 Article 402 of the Code of Criminal Procedure provides, “A woman shall not be selected for jury service unless she' has previously filed with the clerk of court of the parish in which she resides a written declaration of her desire to be subject to jury service.” , , we stated the reason for the exclusion of women from mandatory jury service as follows: “Nor can we conclude that the statute exempting women from jury service on the basis of their sex is not based upon a reasonable classifica
- State v. Woodfork 232 So. 2d 290 La. 1970