Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fruehauf Trailer Company v. Baillio, 210 So. 2d 312.

46 citing documents.

Joshua B. Archote v. William F. Tate IV, in his official capacity as president and custodian of records … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
341, -829 (1969); (1968); Thomas v. Comfort Center of Monroe, LA, Inc., 2010-0494 (La.
Floyd Safford v. New Orleans Fire Department La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
App. 4 Cir. 1/26/05), -69; -15 (1968)).
Riedel v. Fenasci 270 So. 3d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Baillio , , 190, , 315 (1968) ; Wells v. Hannah , 2017-1399 (La.
Lewis v. La. State Judicial Review Bd. 264 So. 3d 1208 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Baillio , , 190, , 315 (1968) ; Wells v. Hannah , 2017-1399 (La.
Roubion Shoring Co. v. Crescent Shoring, L.L.C. 222 So. 3d 921 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2017
341 , -29 (1969); , (1968).
McGee v. Denham Holdings, L.L.C. 214 So. 3d 8 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
341, 348-49 , -29 (1969); , (1968).
Edwin K. Hunter, Apc v. Thomas Glynn Blazier La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
341, (1969); So.2d 312 (1968); Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell, 250 La.
Simone B. Guillory v. Samuel S. Broussard, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
341, ); So.2d 312 (1968); Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell, 250 La.
Demetrious R. Frazier v. Luke A. Difulco, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
341, ); So.2d 312 (1968); Kirkeby–Natus Corporation v. Campbell, 250 La.
In Re: Interdiction of James H. Talley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
341, (1969), So.2d 312 (1968).
Renee Christine Dietz v. Superior Oil Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
Lozier v. Estate of Elmer 64 So. 3d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
341 , (1969); , (1968); Kirkeby-Natus Corp. v. Campbell, 250 La.
White Haute, LLC v. Mayo 38 So. 3d 944 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
341 , -29 (La.1969); , Roger v. Roger, 99-765, pp. 3-4 (La.App.
Amy M. Trahan v. Lafayette Parish School Board La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
341, (1969), and Fruehauf Trailer Company v. 3 Baillio, So.2d 312 (1968).
Trahan v. Lafayette Parish School Bd. 978 So. 2d 1105 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Reed v. Columbia/HCA Information Service, Inc. 761 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
341 , -29 (1969); , (1968); Brister v. Continental Ins.
Reno v. Perkins Engines, Inc. 754 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
341, 348-49 , -29 (1969); , (1968).
Lesniewski v. Lesniewski 595 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1992
(1968); Smith v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity, 254 La.
Walsh v. Walsh 544 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
Weston v. Raymond Corp. 531 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
341 , , held "[a]ppeals are favored in the law, must be maintained wherever possible, and will not be dismissed for technicalities."
Fuqua v. Gulf Ins. Co. 525 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
341 , , Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell, 250 La.
Jones v. Zumo 479 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1969); , Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell, 250 La.
LeMoine v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 478 So. 2d 971 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
341 , , Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell, 250 La.
Dural v. City of Morgan City 449 So. 2d 1047 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
341 , , Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell, 250 La.
Johnson v. Johnson 432 So. 2d 1140 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Smith v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 254 La.
Carpenter v. Travelers Ins. Co. 402 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
868 , (1967); , (1968); and Smith v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 254 La.
Kidd v. Fortenberry 384 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
(1968); Smith v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., 254 La.
Roche v. Big Moose Oilfield Truck Services, Inc. 371 So. 2d 1374 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
This decision was followed in several later cases, , (1968) and Smith v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, 254 La.
Mirambell v. Lucien J. Caruso, Inc. 365 So. 2d 1196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
868 , ; Fruehauf Trailer Co. v. Baillio, 1968, , ; Smith v. Hartford Acc.
David v. David 347 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
This procedure has been used in several cases, , (1968); Smith v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, 254 La.
Shavers v. Shavers 350 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
(1968); Smith v. *915 Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 254 La.
Halcomb v. Halcomb 343 So. 2d 1183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Neff v. Neff 328 So. 2d 735 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
3rd Cir. 1963); , (1968); XXIX La.L.
Loyacano v. Loyacano 311 So. 2d 910 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
The Supreme Court reversed at , (1968), holding that an appeal will not be dismissed for technicalities and that appellant's inadvertency did not constitute a substantial cause for dismissal.
Smith v. United Fire Insurance 303 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
868 , , , , appeals were maintained despite the motions therefor reciting that the appeals were taken from judgments rendered on specific dates which were dates on which applications for new trials were denied or refused.
Commercial Securities Co. v. Moye 270 So. 2d 881 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
In King v. King, La.App., (1971), , (1968) and Kirkeby-Natus Corp. v. Campbell, 250 La.
Richardson v. Richardson 264 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
Overruled Martin v. Garlotte 261 So. 2d 632 La. 1972
King v. King 253 So. 2d 660 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
We believe, however, , , and Smith v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, 254 La.
Delaware Improvement Corp. v. Shall 243 So. 2d 75 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. McPherson 241 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1968), has pointed out that if the clerk timely lodges the record despite a nonpayment of the fees, then the applicability of the provisions of the article have become moot as the appeal has been perfected by the filing of the record.
Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Lasseigne 232 So. 2d 278 La. 1970
we held that the timely lodging of the record in the Court of Appeal, together with the appellate court filing fee, made moot the question of whether the appellate costs had been timely filed in the trial court.
Dyer v. Miller Buick Co. 227 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Smith v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 223 So. 2d 826 La. 1969
Later, in the cases of Kirkeby-Natus Corporation v. Campbell, supra, , (1968), whére the motions recited that the appeals’were being taken from judgments rendered on certain specific days, which referred to the days on which application for new trials were refused, we concluded that the appeals should not be dismissed since the intention of the parties to appeal from the
H & H Boat Rental, Inc. v. Vidos 221 So. 2d 829 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Duncan v. Gill 222 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Failure to pay the fees timely need be considered only when the record is itself filed after the return day, when the question becomes whether the delay in filing the record is imputable to appellant’s failure to pay the fees timely; if the record is in fact timely filed such failure is immaterial, , (1968).