Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Mullin v. Skains, 215 So. 2d 643.

14 citing documents.

Perkins v. SCAFFOLDING RENTAL & ERECTION SERVICE 568 So. 2d 549 La. 1990
[4] , (1968), where we held that a dismissal by voluntary nonsuit against one co-tortfeasor did not bar a claim of contribution from that tortfeasor.
Recard v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co. 503 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
The cases relied upon by plaintiff-appellee are inapposite, i.e., , (1968), and Holmes v. State, Through the Department of Transportation and Development, (La.App.
Landry v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 504 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
(1968); Thompson *175 v. Cheathan, (La.App.
Holmes v. State Through Dept. of Highways 466 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Followed Elliott v. Aetna Cas. and Sur. Co. 387 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Richard v. Southwest Louisiana Hospital Ass'n 383 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
In Mullin, supra, [ , ], there was an express finding by the court of negligence on the part of the dismissed party.
Thompson v. Cheathan 376 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Thomas v. W & W CLARKLIFT, INC. 375 So. 2d 375 La. 1979
Gour v. Daray Motor Co., Inc. 373 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
LSA-Civil Code Articles 2103, 2324; , (1968); (La.
Brandon v. State, Through Dept. of Highways 367 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
2nd Cir. 1968) and , (La.App.
Roberts v. Tenneco, Inc. 363 So. 2d 1275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
(1968) quoted at : “***** However, in the case at bar there was no compromise agreement amongst the joint tort-feasors, nor a release by plaintiff with either of the joint tort-feasors.
Holmes v. Reliance Ins. Co. 359 So. 2d 1102 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
(1968), affirming the Court of Appeal decision at (La.App.
Cavalier v. City of New Orleans 273 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
art. 2324; , (1968); Zeller v. Louisiana Cypress Lumber Co., 9 La.App.
Cunningham v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 228 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
the Supreme Court impliedly approved the result reached in Harvey, after distinguishing Mullin from Harvey.