DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tripoli v. Gurry, 218 So. 2d 563.

47 citing documents.

  • Landry v. Bellanger 851 So. 2d 943 La. 2003
  • Domingue Ex Rel. Domingue v. Allied 849 So. 2d 690 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • Landry v. Bellanger 813 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
  • Clark v. Burchard 802 So. 2d 824 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
  • Brumfield v. Coastal Cargo Co., Inc. 768 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2000
  • Robinson v. Dunn 683 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
  • Robertson v. Aetna Casualty & Surety 563 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
  • Sills v. Mid-South Sports, Inc. 550 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
  • Harris v. Doucette 539 So. 2d 997 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
  • Robinson v. Hardy 505 So. 2d 767 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • Harris v. Pineset 499 So. 2d 499 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    (1969); Perkins v. Certa, supra; (La.App.
  • Duplechin v. Toce 497 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
  • Perkins v. Certa 469 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • Barras v. Touchet 467 So. 2d 172 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • Bray v. Isbell 458 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    4th Cir.1981); , (1969).
  • State v. Gonday 442 So. 2d 703 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Dixon v. Winston 417 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    wherein our Supreme Court stated: "It is correctly stated in Alexander v. McCray (La.App.), that `the law is well settled in actions for damages for battery that a plaintiff cannot recover damages for such battery if the evidence establishes that he is at fault in provoking the difficulty in wh
  • Campbell v. Mouton 412 So. 2d 191 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • West v. Jones 411 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Stewart v. Vidrine 408 So. 2d 413 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Levesque v. Saba 402 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
  • Rahm v. Exxon Corp. 399 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Neville v. Johnson 398 So. 2d 111 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    3rd Cir. 1973); , (1969).
  • Knuckles v. Beaugh 392 So. 2d 710 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
  • Freeman v. Bell 366 So. 2d 197 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
  • Vaughn v. Gallo Wine Co. 379 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    But appellant takes issue with the trial judge’s conclusion that when Vaughn struck at him Bates “had every right to defend himself with the night stick, and did not use it with excessive force, under the circumstances at the time.” *763 , (1969), (La.App.
  • Sherwood v. Sepulvado 362 So. 2d 1161 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
  • Geiger v. Hallmark 355 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    2 Cir. 1967).” , (1969).
  • Matthews v. Sno's Seafood & Steak House, Inc. 356 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Andrepont v. Naquin 345 So. 2d 1216 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Watts v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, (La.App.
  • Ferrantelli v. Wright 346 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    The trial judge’s decision was essentially a , .
  • White v. Morris 345 So. 2d 461 La. 1977
  • Davis v. Marie 339 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    (1969) and the cases therein cited.
  • Bernstine v. City of Natchitoches 335 So. 2d 51 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Babineaux v. PERNIE BAILEY DRILLING CO. 335 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Robins v. City of Baton Rouge 331 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    was a case involving the same principle as Mullins , the use of reasonable force to repel aggression.
  • Watts v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 309 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
  • Willis v. Willis 287 So. 2d 642 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    (1969); see also Haynes v. Modern Woodmen of America, supra.
  • Squyres v. Phillips 285 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Caroli v. Britt 284 So. 2d 188 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    (1969), as follows: “It is correctly stated in Alexander v. McCray (La.App.), that ‘the law is well settled in actions for damages for battery that a plaintiff cannot recover damages for such battery if the evidence establishes that he is at fault in provoking .
  • Brasseaux v. Girouard 269 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Phillips v. Freiler 271 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Flores v. Black 260 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (4th Cir. 1963); Buchert v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, La.App., (4th Cir. 1969); Gallagher v. Taylor, La.App., (2d Cir. 1967); Deville v. Wilks, La.App., (3d Cir. 1969); Murray v. Dominick, La.App., (2d Cir. 1970); , (1969); Wilson v. Dimitri, La.App., (4th Cir. 1962); Brazil v. McCray, La.App., (1st Cir. 1957); Bethley v. Cochrane, La.App., (Orl.Cir.1955).
  • Leger v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 248 So. 2d 921 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1969) in concluding that Delta is entitled to recover only the compensation benefits paid by it covering the period of plaintiff’s disability which was attributable to the accident.
  • McCullough v. McANNELLY 248 So. 2d 7 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1969), the court said: "It is correctly stated in Alexander v. McCray (La.App.), that `the law is well settled in actions for damages for battery that a plaintiff cannot recover damages for such battery if the evidence establishes that he is at fault in provoking the difficulty in which
  • Terito v. McAndrew 246 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Pohl v. Licata 236 So. 2d 259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1969), required dismissal of plaintiff’s case.