DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Grant v. Touro Infirmary, 223 So. 2d 148.

32 citing documents.

  • Papania v. State ex rel. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 108 So. 3d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    Examples include: a governing board’s duty to select its employees with reasonable care, , (1969), the board’s duty to furnish the hospital with reasonably adequate supplies, equipment and facilities for use in treatment and diagnosis of patients, (La.App.
  • Brenna Davis v. Women & Children's Hospital Lake Charles La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
    5 McLin v. Breaux, 05-1911 (La.App.
  • Davis v. Women & Children's Hospital Lake Charles 74 So. 3d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    (1969), McLin v. Breaux, 05-1911 (LaApp.
  • Grimes v. LOUISIANA MEDICAL MUT. INS. CO. 29 So. 3d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
    (1969), overruled on other grounds
  • McLin v. Breaux 950 So. 2d 711 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
  • Bujol v. Entergy Services, Inc. 833 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
    [32] Accord, Tyler *981 v. Touro Infirmary , , (1969), [33] where the court held the failure of the defendant hospital's surgical nurses to properly count sponges during surgery did not constitute "service of a professional nature" within the meaning of a "Malpractice and Professional Services" exclusion in the hospital's general liabilit
  • Romero v. Bellina 798 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
  • Armand v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN 729 So. 2d 1085 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
    Examples include: the governing board's duty to select its employees with reasonable care, , (1969), overruled on other grounds by, the board's duty to furnish the hospital with reasonably adequate supplies, equipment and facilities for use in treatment and diagnosis of patients; (La.App.
  • Johnston v. Southwest Louisiana Ass'n 693 So. 2d 1195 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
  • Hollingsworth v. Bowers 690 So. 2d 825 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    (1969), overruled on other grounds
  • Goodliffe v. Parish Anesthesia Associates 663 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
    NOTES [1] , Parker v. St.
  • Hutchinson v. Patel 637 So. 2d 415 La. 1994
    [13] , (1969), where this court held the defendant hospital's surgical nurses' failure to properly count sponges during surgery was not "service of a professional nature" within the meaning of a "Malpractice and Professional Services" exclusion in the hospital's general liability policy, therefore the policy
  • Parmelee v. Kline 579 So. 2d 1008 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1991
    In a case involving a lap sponge left in a person's body following surgery, the Louisiana *1020 Supreme Court stressed the importance of "immediate supervision and control" by the surgeon in order to impose vicarious liability on a "borrowed servant" , : While the general rule that the surgeon is in charge of all personnel in the operating room during the performance of the operation, we do not feel that the evidence justifies the conclusion that, under modern medical operative procedures, it ca
  • American Cas. Co. v. Hartford Ins. Co. 479 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    the court held that the counting of surgical sponges by a surgical nurse was not a professional service.
  • Sibley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University 477 So. 2d 1094 La. 1985
    For example, the governing board of a hospital owes a duty to select its employees with reasonable care, , (1969), a duty to furnish the hospital with reasonably adequate supplies, equipment, appliances and facilities for use in the diagnosis and treatment of patients, Snipes v. So.
  • Smith v. Millers Mut. Ins. Co. 419 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
    Third party plaintiff cites Grant v. Touro Infirmary, et al., and Louisiana Title Insurance Company v. Cary Hodges & Associates, Inc., et al., (1st Cir. 1978) for his contention that expert testimony would not be required to show what Lasseigne's duty was.
  • Holloway v. Southern Baptist Hospital 367 So. 2d 871 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    Lloyd's argues from Grant v. Touro Infirmary, 1969, , , that the nurses' acts or failure to act was not negligence in professional services.
  • Fontenot v. New York Life Ins. Co. 357 So. 2d 1185 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
  • Megason v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance 355 So. 2d 945 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
  • Parker v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. 335 So. 2d 725 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
    (1969), the Supreme Court held that while it is the general rule that the surgeon is in charge of all personnel during the performance of the operation, the borrowed servant doctrine does not apply in the instance of operations performed under modern techniques requiring team performance where the nurs
  • Guilbeau v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. 325 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
  • Chappetta v. Ciaravella 311 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
  • Green v. State, Southwest Louisiana Charity Hosp. 309 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    cited by the defendant as authority for not applying the doctrine of respondeat superior.
  • Jackson v. Doe 296 So. 2d 323 La. 1974
    (1969), and stated: "* * * We hold that the Rapides General Hospital and other charitable institutions are not immune from suit in tort and that injured parties proceeding against such institutions need not plead or establish those circumstances which some courts have recognized in the past as exceptio
  • Jackson v. Doe 286 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1969), states this and cites 15 Am.
  • Connor v. Methodist Hospital 291 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Wells v. Woman's Hospital Foundation 286 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1969) to the effect that a surgeon's leaving a sponge within a patient's body may be regarded as negligence per se.
  • Garlington v. Kingsley 289 So. 2d 88 La. 1974
    (1969) for support in urging the applicability of the charitable immunity doctrine which was the basis for the sustaining of the exception of no cause of action.
  • Garlington v. Kingsley 277 So. 2d 183 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Womack v. Travelers Insurance Co. 251 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1969), which distinguished between professional and administrative duties of various personnel engaged in performing or assisting in abdominal surgery.
  • Station v. Travelers Insurance Co. 236 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    More recently, , (1969) our Supreme Court held that the counting of sponges prior to and following an operation is not a service of a professional nature but merely administrative in character and the performance of such an act required neither special training nor the exercise of professional judgment.
  • Barrios v. Sara Mayo Hospital 224 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    The Supreme Court as late as May 5, 1969 applied the doctrine in the case of Grant v. Touro Infirmary et als., La.App., of the docket of that Court.