Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Whitfield, 219 So. 2d 493.

29 citing documents.

State v. Cousin 710 So. 2d 1065 La. 1998
251 , (1971); , (1969); State v. Barbar, 250 La.
State v. Issac 527 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Davenport 399 So. 2d 201 La. 1981
: "The jurisprudence is now well settled that the State is not required to permit inspection of a police report or a prior statement for use in cross-examination of a State witness for impeachment purposes unless the accused first shows that the report indicates that one or more of the ma
State v. Bryant 351 So. 2d 1188 La. 1977
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Forbes 348 So. 2d 983 La. 1977
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Francis 345 So. 2d 1120 La. 1977
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Bolton 337 So. 2d 446 La. 1976
1070 , (1970); , (1969); State v. Cooper, 249 La.
State v. Lockett 332 So. 2d 443 La. 1976
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Demery 324 So. 2d 418 La. 1975
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Babin 319 So. 2d 367 La. 1975
(1969) (summarizing later cases.
State v. Kuykendall 319 So. 2d 326 La. 1975
1070 , (1970); , (1969); and State v. Martin, 250 La.
State v. Batiste 318 So. 2d 27 La. 1975
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Nance 315 So. 2d 695 La. 1975
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Mitchell 311 So. 2d 888 La. 1975
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Lee 311 So. 2d 876 La. 1975
(1969); State v. Martin, 250 La.
State v. Hayes 306 So. 2d 705 La. 1975
521 , (1969); , (1969); State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Freeman 306 So. 2d 703 La. 1975
*705 679, ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Kaufman 304 So. 2d 300 La. 1974
105 , (1971); , (1969); State v. Reed, 49 La.Ann.
State v. Adams 302 So. 2d 599 La. 1974
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Flood 301 So. 2d 637 La. 1974
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Asher 294 So. 2d 223 La. 1974
521 , ; , ; State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Cryer 263 So. 2d 895 La. 1972
1070 , (1970); , (1969); State v. Martin, 250 La.
State v. Nelson 259 So. 2d 46 La. 1972
521 , (1969); , (1969); State v. Progue, 243 La.
State v. Gladden 257 So. 2d 388 La. 1972
(1969); State v. Bonner, 252 La.
Distinguished State v. Ray 249 So. 2d 540 La. 1971
(1969) the question was preserved for appellate review by an objection to the introduction of a police report which was.
State v. Robertson 246 So. 2d 6 La. 1971
235 , ; , ; State v. Coleman, 254 La.
State v. Williams 246 So. 2d 4 La. 1971
509 , ; , ; and State v. Ray (Hayes), 258 La.
State v. Mitchell 246 So. 2d 814 La. 1971
State v. Nails 234 So. 2d 184 La. 1970