DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Duplessis, 257 So. 2d 135.

25 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. William Felix Vail La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    605, (1971), where the problems were discussed, So.2d 135 (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment ‘insofar as it imposes the death sentence’ for a ‘Witherspoon’ violation.
  • State v. Vail 236 So. 3d 644 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    605 , (1971), where the problems were discussed, and State v. Duplessis , , (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment 'insofar as it imposes the death sentence' for a 'Witherspoon' violation.
  • State of Louisiana v. Fredrick Thomas La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2017
    605, (1971), where the problems were discussed, So.2d 135 (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment „insofar as it imposes the death 6 sentence‟ for a „Witherspoon‟ violation.
  • State v. Thomas 258 So. 3d 17 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    605 , (1971), where the problems were discussed, and State v. Duplessis , , (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment 'insofar as it imposes the death sentence' for a 'Witherspoon' violation.
  • State v. GRH 10 So. 3d 896 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    605 , (1971), where the problems were discussed, , (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment "insofar as it imposes the death sentence" for a "Witherspoon" violation.
  • State of Louisiana v. G. R. H. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    605, (1971), where the problems were discussed, So.2d 135 (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment “insofar as it imposes the death sentence” for a “Witherspoon” violation.
  • State v. Craig 340 So. 2d 191 La. 1976
    605 , (1971), where the problems were discussed, , (1971), following the reversal by the United States Supreme Court of our judgment "insofar as it imposes the death sentence" for a "Witherspoon" violation.
  • State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
  • State v. Williams 310 So. 2d 528 La. 1975
    2282 , 29 L. Ed.2d 856 , on remand, , (1971); State v. Curry, 262 La.
  • State v. Bush 297 So. 2d 415 La. 1974
    2282 , 29 L.Ed.2d 856 , on remand , .
  • State v. Kaufman 278 So. 2d 86 La. 1973
    605 , (1971), , (1971) by remanding the case to the trial court for resentencing to life imprisonment.
  • State v. Rideau 278 So. 2d 100 La. 1973
    (1971) and Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 , 92 S.Ct.
  • State v. Preece 270 So. 2d 850 La. 1972
  • State v. Bullock 269 So. 2d 824 La. 1972
  • State v. Square 268 So. 2d 229 La. 1972
  • State v. Singleton 268 So. 2d 220 La. 1972
    *270 2d 121 (1971) , (1971).
  • State v. Franklin 268 So. 2d 249 La. 1972
  • State v. Williams 268 So. 2d 227 La. 1972
  • State v. Douglas 268 So. 2d 231 La. 1972
  • State v. McAllister 268 So. 2d 231 La. 1972
  • State v. Marks 268 So. 2d 253 La. 1972
  • State v. Strong 268 So. 2d 232 La. 1972
  • State v. Poland 268 So. 2d 221 La. 1972
  • State v. Sinclair 268 So. 2d 514 La. 1972
  • State v. Shaffer 257 So. 2d 121 La. 1971
    Moreover, , , is before us now on remand from the United States Supreme Court for disposition under Witherspoon and companion cases, only the sentence of Duplessis having been set aside.