49287
Precedential
Processed
State v. Skiffer
State v. Skiffer, 218 So. 2d 313 (La. 1969).
Cited by
- State Of Louisiana v. Damon Cain, Jr. La. 2022
- State v. Ford 713 So. 2d 1214 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
- State v. Ondek 584 So. 2d 282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- State v. Coleman 395 So. 2d 704 La. 1981
- State v. LeJeune 352 So. 2d 619 La. 1977
- State v. Trudell 350 So. 2d 658 La. 1977
- State v. Haynes 339 So. 2d 328 La. 1976
- State v. Tucker 332 So. 2d 797 La. 1976
- State v. White 329 So. 2d 738 La. 1976
- State v. Ned 326 So. 2d 477 La. 1976
- State v. Callihan 320 So. 2d 155 La. 1975
- State v. Whatley 320 So. 2d 123 La. 1975
Opinion text
SANDERS, Justice (dissenting). As I appreciate the evidence, the defendant gave an unsolicited exculpatory statement while he was being transported to the parish jail. Since the officers sought no statement at the time, no interrogation was in progress. Under these circumstances, I do not consider the statement as one “stemming from custodial interrogation of the defendant.” Hence, the decision in Miranda v. Arizona is inapplicable. For the reasons assigned, I respectfully dissent.