Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Daste, 223 So. 2d 848.

16 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Succession of Vic Reno La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2021
Succession of Estelle Amelia Cole, Widow of Frank Cornelius Cole, Sr. . La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2019
Appellants suggest that dismissal would be inappropriate given the Louisiana Supreme Court’s holding in So.2d 848 (1969).
Succession of Sporl 859 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
We also find support in the Supreme Court case of , (1969).
Succession of Doll v. Doll 593 So. 2d 1239 La. 1992
Simon v. Fasig-Tipton Co. of New York 574 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Succession of Goffinet 565 So. 2d 951 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Hamilton v. Hamilton 522 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
Stevens v. Stevens 476 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Succession of Tucker v. Poche 449 So. 2d 1020 La. 1984
(1969); New Orleans Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Pharr, supra; (La.App.
Succession of Crain 442 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1 In the case of , (1969), the court reviewed a similar judgment and concluded that it was a judgment settling the claims of the parties, not a judgment homologating a tableau of distribution.
United Credit Plan of Gretna, Inc. v. Pullen 435 So. 2d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Cosey v. Cosey 376 So. 2d 486 La. 1979
1900, on parol to show "consideration.") [2] The possibility that Sidney wanted his new wife, Lillian, to have a half interest in the property and requested of the Cate heirs a deed in both names is so remote, on this record (compare Succession of Daste, 1969, , ), it scarce deserves discussion.
New Orleans Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Pharr 377 So. 2d 387 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
However, in , and (La.App.
Mestayer v. Mestayer 311 So. 2d 632 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
A recent case, , (1969) involved a trial court judgment which “Ordered, Adjudged and Decreed” that certain rights existed between various parties claiming an interest in the succession.
Cookmeyer v. Cookmeyer 274 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
[5] The cases cited by the defendant to support her second contention, , and Succession of Russo, La.App., , are not apropos.
Succession of Russo 246 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971