Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Bienvenu v. Angelle, 223 So. 2d 140.
-
Stephen Amedee & Tanya Amedee v. Aimbridge Hospitality Llc D/b/a Embassy Suites New Orleans & The City Of …
La. 2022
” We have interpreted this Section to afford “every individual” the “right to an adjudication by some tribunal having original jurisdiction” and “to additionally afford[] the right of appeal.” (La.
-
Lambert v. Delcarpio
272 So. 3d 112
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
182 , , 144 (1969) (overruled on other matter, Gonzales v. Xerox Corporation , 254 La.
-
Kirksey v. New Orleans Jazz & Heritage Foundation, Inc.
116 So. 3d 664
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
182 , for the proposition that La.
-
In Re Raspanti
8 So. 3d 526
La. 2009
182 , (1969), overruled on other grounds, Gonzales v. Xerox Corporation, 254 La.
-
Cooksey v. Stewart
938 So. 2d 1206
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
182 , (1969), rev'd on other grounds by Gonzales v. Xerox Corp., 254 La.
- Connolly v. Stone 807 So. 2d 979 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2002
-
Marrogi v. Howard
805 So. 2d 1118
La. 2002
182 , (1969), for the proposition that testimony given at a judicial proceeding by a non-litigant witness carries with it absolute immunity from a defamation suit stemming from the utterance of such testimony.
-
Knapper v. Connick
681 So. 2d 944
La. 1996
182 , (1969), overruled on other grounds
-
Davis v. Borskey
660 So. 2d 17
La. 1995
182 , (1969) (plaintiff sued state legislator for allegedly defamatory statements made in an attempt to block her appointment as Parish Director of Public Welfare); (La.App.
- Stj v. Pm 556 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
- S.T.J. v. P.M. 556 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
-
Rosell v. Esco
549 So. 2d 840
La. 1989
182 , (1969), overuled on different grounds, (La.App.
-
Goldstein v. Serio
496 So. 2d 412
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
182 , (1969) (overruled on other matter, ).
- Andrews v. Mosley Well Service 507 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
- Lauga v. McDougall 463 So. 2d 754 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
- Landry v. Bill Garrett Chevrolet, Inc. 430 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
- Hairford v. Long 430 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- Davidson v. Peden 413 So. 2d 568 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
-
Kaplan v. Missouri Pacific R. Co.
409 So. 2d 298
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
182 , (1969); Hanks v. Drs.
- Wattigny v. Lambert 408 So. 2d 1126 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
-
Miller v. Fogleman Truck Lines, Inc.
398 So. 2d 634
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
182 , (1969); Hanks v. Drs.
-
Gasquet v. Commercial Union Ins. Co.
391 So. 2d 466
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
In Gonzales, supra, however, (La.
-
Ragas v. Argonaut Southwest Ins. Co.
388 So. 2d 707
La. 1980
182 , (1969) has an appellate court in modern times remanded a case for retrial because of legal errors where the record was otherwise complete.
- Hebert v. Brazzel 393 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
- Bond v. Jack 387 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
- Moity v. Busch 368 So. 2d 1134 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
- Hanks v. Drs. Ranson, Swan & Burch, Ltd. 359 So. 2d 1089 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
- Higgins v. Johnson 349 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
-
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc.
330 So. 2d 649
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
182 , (1969), a leading case on the question of remand because of erroneous instructions, the court specifically reserved to the appellate forums the right to decide in each particular case whether a remand would serve the interests of justice.
- Wilkinson v. Travelers Insurance Co. 330 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
- Gonzales v. Xerox Corp. 320 So. 2d 163 La. 1975
- Calvert v. Simon 311 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
- Gonzales v. Xerox Corp. 307 So. 2d 153 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
- Dixon v. Copeland 289 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
- Bush v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company 264 So. 2d 717 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
- Foster v. McClain 251 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
- Brown v. News-World Publishing Corp. 245 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971