Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ponthieux v. Lindsay, 226 So. 2d 482.

14 citing documents.

  • Wooley v. AMCARE HEALTH PLANS OF LOUISIANA 944 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    3 Cir.1968) (on second rehearing), and the authorities cited therein, affirmed, , (1969).
  • Harris v. Angelina Casualty Co. 559 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    3d Cir.1968), affirmed on other grounds, , (1969).
  • RGC Investments, Inc. v. Almerico 435 So. 2d 1043 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
  • South Louisiana Contractors, Inc. v. Freeman 393 So. 2d 461 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • Tucker v. Tucker 378 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1979
  • Lushute v. Diesi 354 So. 2d 179 La. 1978
    (1969); McMorris v. Home Indemnity Ins.
  • Swain v. Swain 339 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    3rd Cir. 1968), affirmed, , (1969).
  • Distinguished Evans v. Naihaus 326 So. 2d 601 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    (1969), which involved "the mere isolated use of a casual contractor to move and repair some rental units .
  • Paige v. Tregre 283 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Distinguished Broussard v. Adams 270 So. 2d 913 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1969), which was cited and relied on.by the trial court.
  • Doss v. American Ventures, Inc. 261 So. 2d 615 La. 1972
    In one of our more recent decisions on this issue, , (1969), it was contended that the defendant therein (an insurance agent) was liable in compensation for injuries to plaintiff which were sustained when the latter was engaged in moving buildings for the defendant, it being asserted that the buildings were to be rented by the defendant for profit.
  • Jason v. Blanchard 261 So. 2d 296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Fontenot v. Travelers Insurance Co. 236 So. 2d 889 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    1 Cir. 1963); McMorris v. Home Indemnity Insurance Company, supra; , (1969).
  • Moak v. Link-Belt Company 229 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    In Ponthieux v. Lindsay, La., 485-486 (1969), the court observes: "It is, of course, well established that the purpose of LRS 23:1061 is to prevent the evasion of the compensation provisions of the law by contracting out part of the principal's regular and hazardous occupation or his contractual obligation and, therefore, he is not liable in