DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hall, 218 So. 2d 320.

33 citing documents.

  • State v. Jackson 926 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    928 , (1945)), videotaped recordings of a confession ( , (1969)), and tape recorded confessions (State v. Bendo, La., (1973)).
  • State v. Yates 350 So. 2d 1169 La. 1977
    928 , (1945); to obtain production of a taped confession, , (1969); or some of the confiscated narcotic evidence in a narcotic prosecution, State v. Migliore, 261 La.
  • State v. Hodges 349 So. 2d 250 La. 1977
    928 , (1945); to obtain production of a taped confession, , (1969); or some of the confiscated narcotic evidence in a narcotic prosecution, State v. Migliore, 261 La.
  • State v. Tyler 342 So. 2d 574 La. 1977
    928 , (1945); to obtain production of a taped confession, , (1969); or some of the confiscated narcotic evidence in a narcotic prosecution, State v. Migliore, 261 La.
  • State v. Jenkins 340 So. 2d 157 La. 1976
    928 , (1945)) and video taped statements ( , (1969)).
  • State v. Perkins 337 So. 2d 1145 La. 1976
    928 , (1945)), video-taped recordings of a confession ( , (1969)), and tape recorded confessions ( State v. Bendo, La., (1973)).
  • State v. Brumfield 329 So. 2d 181 La. 1976
    928 , (1945); to obtain production of a taped confession, , (1969); or some of the confiscated narcotic evidence in a narcotic prosecution, State v. Migliore, 261 La.
  • State v. Ball 328 So. 2d 81 La. 1976
    928 , (1945); to obtain production of a taped confession, , (1969); or some of the confiscated narcotic evidence in a narcotic prosecution, *83 State v. Migliore, 261 La.
  • State v. Liesk 326 So. 2d 871 La. 1976
    For the same reasons of fairness in affording a defendant a proper opportunity to prepare a defense, the accused is also entitled to pre-trial inspection of electronically recorded statements, and of videotape recordings of a confession, , (1969).
  • State v. Howard 325 So. 2d 812 La. 1976
    928 , (1945); to obtain production of a taped confession, , (1969); or some of the confiscated narcotic evidence in a narcotic prosecution.
  • State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
  • State v. White 321 So. 2d 491 La. 1975
    928 , (1945); to obtain production of a taped confession, , (1969); or some of the confiscated narcotic evidence in a narcotic prosecution, State v. Migliore, 261 La.
  • State v. Boothe 310 So. 2d 826 La. 1975
    928 , (1945)) and video taped statements ( , (1969)).
  • State v. Collins 308 So. 2d 263 La. 1975
    928 , (1945); to obtain production of a taped confession, , (1969); or some of the confiscated narcotic evidence in a narcotic prosecution, State v. Migliore, 261 La.
  • State v. Nelson 306 So. 2d 745 La. 1975
    (1969) and State v. Hunter, 250 La.
  • State v. LeBlanc 305 So. 2d 416 La. 1974
    We held: “Under the provisions of the Constitutions of the United States and this State, every accused is entitled to, and is guaranteed, a fair trial, and to deny his counsel a pre-trial inspection of [the] accused’s written confession is, in our opinion, tantamount to depriving such accused of a fair trial, and is in violation of his constitutional rights.” , (1969), the rule was extended to an electronically recorded video tape confession, (1973), to tape recorded inculpatory statements.
  • State v. Freetime 303 So. 2d 487 La. 1974
    (1969), a written confession of the defendant is documentary evidence.
  • State v. Watson 301 So. 2d 653 La. 1974
    The rule allowing pretrial inspection of written confessions was extended to include video taped confessions, , (1969), and tape recorded confessions
  • State v. Cordier 297 So. 2d 181 La. 1974
    928 , (1945) , (1969) allowing pre-trial inspection of written confessions and video-tape recordings have never been extended to oral statements and admissions.
  • State v. Barnard 287 So. 2d 770 La. 1973
    State v. Dorsey, supra; , (1969).
  • State v. Baker 288 So. 2d 52 La. 1973
    928 , (1945); the video taped confession of the accused, , (1969); and, in some instances, narcotics, a portion of the drug upon which the prosecution depends, State v. Migliore, 261 La.
  • State v. Bendo 281 So. 2d 106 La. 1973
    (1969) we extended the rule of the Dorsey case to an electronically recorded video tape confession.
  • State v. Frezal 278 So. 2d 64 La. 1973
    (1969) permitted a pre-trial inspection of a video-taped confession.
  • State v. Edgecombe 275 So. 2d 740 La. 1973
  • State v. St. Amand 274 So. 2d 179 La. 1973
  • State v. Himel 257 So. 2d 670 La. 1972
  • State v. Cripps 250 So. 2d 382 La. 1971
  • State v. Coney 246 So. 2d 793 La. 1971
    961 , ; , ; State v. Hunter, 250 La.
  • State v. Douglas 237 So. 2d 382 La. 1970
    In the first place, although the learned trial judge may have erred in stating that counsel were not entitled to pretrial inspection of the tape recordings of the confessions because such recordings are oral statements, , (1969), that a video-tape recorded confession constitutes a better record than a written confession, the comment was of no importance in this matter because the District Attorney had, in his answer to the motion for a bill of particulars filed by counsel for Douglas, offered to
  • State v. Fink 231 So. 2d 360 La. 1970
    961 , ; , ; State v. Hunter, 250 La.
  • State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
    961 , ; , ; State v. Dorsey, 207 La.
  • State v. Clack 222 So. 2d 857 La. 1969
    The single exception to this rule has been made in instances where the State has in its possession a written confession of the accused.” , .
  • State v. Crook 221 So. 2d 473 La. 1969
    State v. Dorsey, 207 La.