Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Wright, 225 So. 2d 201.

50 citing documents.

  • Overruled State v. Harris 998 So. 2d 55 La. 2008
    165 , (1972); , (La.App.
  • State v. Warren 700 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1997
    He is entitled to ‘further information, in a proper case, regarding what the State intends to prove, in order that, in fairness, •the accused may more properly defend himself.’ , (1969).
  • State v. Issac 527 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Snyder 496 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Moore 419 So. 2d 963 La. 1982
    State v. Hayes, 306 So.2[d] 705 (La.1975); State v. Dotson, supra ; State v. Wright [ ], (1969) This standard has been consistently followed by this court.
  • State v. Smith 418 So. 2d 515 La. 1982
    State v. King, supra ; State v. Dotson, supra ; , (1969)."
  • State v. Williams 362 So. 2d 530 La. 1978
    State v. King, supra ; State v. Dotson, supra ; , (1969).
  • State v. Drew 360 So. 2d 500 La. 1978
    State v. Robertson, supra; State v. King, supra ; *519 State v. Dotson, supra ; , (1969).
  • State v. Robertson 358 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
    State v. King, supra; State v. Dotson, supra ; , (1969).
  • State v. King 355 So. 2d 1305 La. 1978
    State v. Dotson, supra ; , (1969).
  • State v. Provost 352 So. 2d 661 La. 1977
  • State v. Bryant 351 So. 2d 1188 La. 1977
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Forbes 348 So. 2d 983 La. 1977
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Francis 345 So. 2d 1120 La. 1977
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Marmillion 339 So. 2d 788 La. 1976
  • State v. Badon 338 So. 2d 665 La. 1976
  • State v. Alexander 334 So. 2d 388 La. 1976
  • State v. Lockett 332 So. 2d 443 La. 1976
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Demery 324 So. 2d 418 La. 1975
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
  • State v. Miller 319 So. 2d 339 La. 1975
  • State v. Batiste 318 So. 2d 27 La. 1975
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Nance 315 So. 2d 695 La. 1975
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Mitchell 311 So. 2d 888 La. 1975
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Shelby 308 So. 2d 279 La. 1975
    (1973); , (1969); State v. Stokes, 250 La.
  • State v. Nelson 306 So. 2d 745 La. 1975
  • State v. Hayes 306 So. 2d 705 La. 1975
    471 , (1971); , (1969); State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Freeman 306 So. 2d 703 La. 1975
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Adams 302 So. 2d 599 La. 1974
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Flood 301 So. 2d 637 La. 1974
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Asher 294 So. 2d 223 La. 1974
    State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Lane 292 So. 2d 711 La. 1974
  • State v. Browning 290 So. 2d 322 La. 1974
    743 , (1971); , (1969); State v. Hunter, 250 La.
  • State v. Clark 288 So. 2d 612 La. 1974
    See: , (1969); State v. Barnes, 242 La.
  • State v. Edwards 287 So. 2d 518 La. 1973
    323 , (1971); , (1969); State v. Barksdale, 247 La.
  • State v. Linkletter 286 So. 2d 321 La. 1973
    (1969); see also State v. Brevelle, 264 La.
  • State v. Soukup 275 So. 2d 179 La. 1973
    Douglas v. Alabama, supra, , (1969).
  • State v. Warren 271 So. 2d 527 La. 1973
    (1969); State v. Dillon, 260 La.
  • State v. Dobard 263 So. 2d 16 La. 1972
  • State v. Nelson 259 So. 2d 46 La. 1972
    215 , (1971); , (1969); State v. Whitfield, 253 La.
  • State v. Anderson 259 So. 2d 310 La. 1972
    277 , (1967).” , (1969).
  • State v. Thomas 257 So. 2d 406 La. 1972
  • State v. Bowers 256 So. 2d 435 La. 1972
  • State v. Dillon 255 So. 2d 745 La. 1971
    (1969); State v. Stokes, 250 La.
  • State v. Bland 255 So. 2d 723 La. 1971
  • State v. Robertson 246 So. 2d 6 La. 1971
  • State v. Mitchell 246 So. 2d 814 La. 1971
    Likewise in asking for sketches and drawings, as well as photographs, the defendant was simply making ‘demands for nonessential details’ and likewise asking for ‘a recital of the details of the state’s evidence.’ “While we agree that the matter is somewhat discretionary with the trial judge as the case of State v. Wright [ , ] just stated, we feel that the state in the cases at bar gave a great deal of information and fully answered the motions for Bills of Particulars and even went the extra, m
  • State v. Square 244 So. 2d 200 La. 1971
    15:484 & 485; , (1969).
  • State v. McQueen 243 So. 2d 798 La. 1971
    277 , (1967).” , (1969).
  • State v. Pratt 233 So. 2d 883 La. 1970
    See, , ; Article 484, Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure.