Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. White, 223 So. 2d 843.

21 citing documents.

State v. Moore 877 So. 2d 1027 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2004
(1969); State v. Hattaway, 28,060 (La.App.2d Cir.5/8/96), , writ denied, 96-1900 (La.1/10/97), .
Overruled State v. Roberts 769 So. 2d 162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
State v. Hattaway 674 So. 2d 380 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1996
(1969); State v. Lynch, 94-0543 (La.App.
State v. Reynolds 473 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
State v. Broom 439 So. 2d 357 La. 1983
Furthermore, this Court was once before called upon to consider whether the word deliver was vague [ , (1969)] and at that time concluded: The words "deliver," "delivery," and "delivering" are ordinary words and are used constantly in everyday conversation.
State v. Simmons 422 So. 2d 138 La. 1982
State v. Holmes 388 So. 2d 722 La. 1980
State v. Matthews 380 So. 2d 43 La. 1980
State v. Williams 366 So. 2d 1365 La. 1978
State v. Smith, La., (1976); , (1969).
Languirand v. Languirand 350 So. 2d 973 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
State v. George 346 So. 2d 694 La. 1977
State v. Nix 327 So. 2d 301 La. 1975
State v. Brown 322 So. 2d 211 La. 1975
1024 , ; , ; State v. Bellam, 225 La.
State v. Stetson 317 So. 2d 172 La. 1975
(1969); State v. Glantz, 254 La.
State v. Bradford 298 So. 2d 781 La. 1974
1024 , ; , ; State v. Bellam, 225 La.
State v. Rose 271 So. 2d 863 La. 1973
988 , (1969); , (1969); State v. Glantz, 254 La.
State v. Cryer 263 So. 2d 895 La. 1972
314 , (1970); , (1969); State v. Schoonover, 252 La.
State v. Howard 263 So. 2d 32 La. 1972
1024 , ; , ; State v. Bellam, 225 La.
State v. Anderson 259 So. 2d 310 La. 1972
No further discussion is necessary; defendant’s , ; State v. Dunn, 254 La.
State v. Jackson 254 So. 2d 259 La. 1971
311 , (1968); , (1969) ; State v. Dunn, 254 La.
State v. Brumfield 229 So. 2d 76 La. 1969
No further discussion is necessary; defendant’s , ; State v. Dunn, 254 La.