Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite American Home Assurance Company v. Czarniecki, 230 So. 2d 253.
- Bryant v. Motwani 683 So. 2d 880 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- Langston v. Shirley 682 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
- Orleans Parish School Bd. v. Scheyd, Inc. 673 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
- Mahaffey v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 679 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
- Gleason v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. 660 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
- Panzico v. Price 658 So. 2d 1310 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
-
Becnel v. United Gas Pipeline Co.
655 So. 2d 409
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
American Home Assurance Co. v. Czamiecki, [ , (1969) ]; Appelman, Insurance Law and Practice (Berdal ed.) Sec.
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Roy 653 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
Korossy v. Sunrise Homes, Inc.
653 So. 2d 1215
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
: [T]he insurer's duty to defend suits brought against its insured is determined by the allegations of the injured plaintiff's petition, with the insurer being obligated to furnish a defense unless the petition unambiguously excludes coverage.
- Employees Ins. Representatives, Inc. v. Employers Reinsurance Corp. 653 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
- Panzico v. Price 647 So. 2d 1154 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
-
Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., Inc.
643 So. 2d 1213
La. 1994
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., , (1969); Leon Lowe & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Surplus Lines Ins.
- FEDERAL INS. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. 638 So. 2d 1132 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
-
Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd.
634 So. 2d 1180
La. 1994
American *1186 , (1969).
-
Dennis v. Finish Line, Inc.
636 So. 2d 944
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
(1969); Treadway, 633 So.2d at 627 ; St.
- Charles v. LeBlanc 633 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
- Treadway v. Vaughn 633 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
- Yount v. Maisano 627 So. 2d 148 La. 1993
- Pylant v. Lofton 626 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
- Ducote v. Cliffs Drilling Co. 624 So. 2d 960 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
-
Griffin v. Tenneco Oil Co.
625 So. 2d 1090
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
Micelotti v. Karno, 542 So.2d *1096 734 (La.App.
- Ellis v. Transcontinental Ins. Co. 619 So. 2d 1130 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
- Perkins v. McDow 615 So. 2d 312 La. 1993
- Crabtree v. Hayes-Dockside, Inc. 612 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
-
Duhon v. Nitrogen Pumping & Coiled Tubing Specialists, Inc.
611 So. 2d 158
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
The cornerstone pronouncement of the "duty to defend" , (1969), where the Louisiana Supreme Court stated at 259, : "[T]he insurer's duty to defend suits brought against its insured is determined by the allegations of the injured plaintiff's petition, with the insurer being obligated to furnish a defense unless the petition unambiguously exclud
-
Rio Rouge Development Corp. v. Security First Nat. Bank
610 So. 2d 172
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
and whether summary judgment was properly granted in favor of the insurers.
-
Hutchins v. Hill Petroleum Co.
609 So. 2d 306
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
(1969), the Louisiana Supreme Court fashioned the following test to determine if the insurer has the duty to defend its insured: "Thus, if, assuming all the allegations of the petition to be true, there would be both (1) coverage under the policy and (2) liability to the plaintiff, the insurer must def
-
Duplantis v. State Farm General Ins. Co.
606 So. 2d 51
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
(1969); *53 Ada Resources, Inc., et al. v. Don Chamblin & Assoc., Inc., et al., (La.App.
-
LaFever v. Whitely
613 So. 2d 1007
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
(1969); Hallar Enterprises, (La.App.
-
Strauss v. Rivers
595 So. 2d 706
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Accord: , (1969); Dugas Pest Cont.
- Veillon v. US Fire Ins. Co. 590 So. 2d 1368 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
- Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rs 591 So. 2d 342 La. 1991
-
Usner v. Strobach
591 So. 2d 713
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
(1969) as follows: Generally the insurer's obligation to defend suits against its insured is broader than its liability for damage claims.
-
Hallar Enterprises, Inc. v. Hartman
583 So. 2d 883
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., , (1969).
- Schroeder v. BOARD OF SUP'RS 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
- Schroeder v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University 577 So. 2d 1074 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
-
Lowe & Sons v. Great American Surplus
572 So. 2d 206
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., Cute'-Togs of New Orleans, Inc. v. Louisiana Health Service & Indemnity Company, , (1969); Mattingly v. State, Department of Health and Human Resources, , 84-85 *209 (La.App.
- Desormeaux v. Romero 560 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
- Garner v. Law 560 So. 2d 108 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
-
Williamson v. Historic Hurstville Ass'n
556 So. 2d 103
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
at 259 (1970), the Louisiana Supreme Court discussed the test to be applied in order to determine an insurer's obligation to defend its insured: Generally the insurer's obligation to defend suits against its insured is broader than its liability for damage claims.
-
Rovira v. LaGoDa, Inc.
551 So. 2d 790
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1989
(1969); Cute-Togs of N.O. v. La.
-
Dietrich v. Travelers Ins. Co.
551 So. 2d 64
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
1st Cir.), writ denied, citing, , (La.
-
King v. Louisiana Farm Bureau Ins. Co.
549 So. 2d 367
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
(1969), the court cited Rogillio , in denying coverage to a second permittee who was involved in an accident while operating a vehicle without the knowledge or permission of the named insured.
- Philyaw v. Mid-American Indemnity Co. 548 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
- Micelotti v. Karno 542 So. 2d 734 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
-
Colomb v. US Fidelity and Guar. Co.
539 So. 2d 940
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
Vaughner v. Pulito, 804 F.2d 873, 877 (5th Cir.1986); see also, , (1969).
-
Alombro v. Salman
536 So. 2d 764
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., , (1969)
-
Cook v. Rice
534 So. 2d 1380
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
(1969) and Hughes v. Southeastern Fidelity Ins.
-
Allen v. Keeney
532 So. 2d 521
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., , (1969); (La.App.
-
Explained
Pareti v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co.
519 So. 2d 225
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
See also, , (1969); Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., (La.