Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite American Home Assurance Company v. Czarniecki, 230 So. 2d 253.

172 citing documents.

E L & F Properties, L.L.C. v. Santec Consulting Services Inc La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2026
App. lst Cir. 9/7/22), (La.
Joao A. Silva and Camila Dalazah v. Boh Bros. Construction Co., L.L.C. La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2023
Coastal Chemical Company, LLC v. The Travelers Indemnity Company and Lexington Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Referred to as the " eight -corners rule" ( La.
Coastal Chemical Company, LLC v. The Travelers Indemnity Company and Lexington Insurance Company La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2022
Referred to as the " eight -corners rule" ( La.
Forrest v. Ville St. John Owners Ass'n, Inc. 259 So. 3d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
American Home Assurance Company v. Czarniecki , , , 259 (1969).
Perniciaro v. McInnis 255 So. 3d 1223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
Plaia v. Stewart Enterprises, Inc. 229 So. 3d 480 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Spencer v. Chevron Corp. 202 So. 3d 1055 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Chalmers, Collins & Alwell, Inc. v. Burnett & Company, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
Chalmers, Collins & Alwell, Inc. v. Burnett & Co. 175 So. 3d 1100 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Kacie Renee Spears v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
So.2d 253 (1969); Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., ).
Spears v. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. 160 So. 3d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
(1969); Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., ).
Daniels v. SMG Crystal, LLC 162 So. 3d 1248 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Longleaf Investments, L.L.C. v. Cypress Black Bayou Recreation & Water Conservation District 162 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
American Home Assur *484 , (1969); Lodwick, supra.
Lodwick, L.L.C. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. 126 So. 3d 544 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2013
Elliott, supra; Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., 93-2064 (La.08/18/94), ; ; Sibley v. Deer Valley Homebuilders, Inc., 45,063 (La.App.2d Cir.03/03/10), .
Love v. Sirey 119 So. 3d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Id., , (1969); Meloy v. Conoco, Inc.
Arceneaux v. Amstar Corp. 66 So. 3d 438 La. 2011
(1969); Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., ).
Bennett v. RYDER TRUCK RENTAL, INC. 66 So. 3d 1154 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
American Home Assurance Company v. *1160 Czarniecki
Sensebe v. Canal Indemnity Co. 58 So. 3d 441 La. 2011
Sibley v. DEER VALLEY HOMEBUILDERS, INC. 32 So. 3d 1034 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2010
Cunard Line Limited Co. v. Datrex Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., So.2d 253 (1969); Leon Lowe & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Surplus Lines Ins.
Cunard Line Ltd. v. Datrex, Inc. 26 So. 3d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., So.2d 253 (1969); Leon Lowe & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Surplus Lines Ins.
City of Alexandria v. ANNRICH, INC. 18 So. 3d 801 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
App.3 Cir. 3/29/06), ( , (1969)).
Elvist J. Tabor, Sr. v. Anco Insulations, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
3 Cir. 3/29/06), ( So.2d 253 (1969)).
Tabor v. Anco Insulations, Inc. 999 So. 2d 258 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
App. 3 Cir. 3/29/06), ( , (1969)).
Beck v. BURGUENO 996 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., 93-2064 (La.8/18/94), ; , (1969); Gleason v. State Farm Mut.
Mobile Imaging, Inc. v. Kevin Fix La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Rather, in order to determine whether an insurer may have a duty to defend its insured against claims made against it, we look only to the original allegations of fault made against the insured: 3 The cornerstone pronouncement of the “duty to defend” So.2d 253 (1969), where the Louisiana Supreme Court stated at 259, : “[T]he insurer’s duty to defend suits brought against its insured is determined by the allegations of the injured plaintiff’s petition, with the insurer being obligated to f
Mobile Imaging, Inc. v. Fix 980 So. 2d 240 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
Rather, in order to determine whether an insurer may have a duty to defend its insured against claims made against it, we look only to the original allegations of fault made against the insured: The cornerstone pronouncement of the "duty to defend" , (1969), where the Louisiana Supreme Court stated at 259, : "[T]he insurer's duty to defend suits brought against its insured is determined by the allegations of the injured plaintiff's petition, with the insurer being obligated to furnish a defense
Alexander v. Cornett 961 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2007
Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., 93-2064 (La.8/18/94), ; , (1969); Gleason v. State Farm Mut.
Elliott v. Continental Cas. Co. 949 So. 2d 1247 La. 2007
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., , (1969); Leon Lowe & Sons, Inc. v. Great American Surplus Lines Ins.
Holzenthal v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2007
Holzenthal v. SEWERAGE & WATER BD. OF NO 950 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Grimaldi Mechanical v. the Gray Ins. Co. 933 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
Richard v. Metro Bingo of Lafayette, Inc. 926 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
(1969), the supreme court outlined an insurer's duty to defend, explaining: Generally the insurer's obligation to defend suits against its insured is broader than its liability for damage claims.
Herbert P. Richard and Bridget Richard v. Metro Bingo of Lafayette, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
the supreme court outlined an insurer’s duty to defend, explaining: Generally the insurer’s obligation to defend suits against its insured is broader than its liability for damage claims.
Lang v. Asten, Inc. 900 So. 2d 1031 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Mossy Motors, Inc. v. Cameras America 898 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2005
Edwards v. Daugherty 883 So. 2d 932 La. 2004
(1969); Hobbs v. Fireman's Fund American Ins.
Rando v. Top Notch Properties, LLC 879 So. 2d 821 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2004
Crews v. Griffith 856 So. 2d 1229 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
(1969) (citation omitted), the supreme court explained: [T]he insurer's duty to defend suits brought against its insured is determined by the allegations of the injured plaintiff's petition, with the insurer being obligated to furnish a defense unless the petition unambiguously excludes coverage.
William P. Crews, Jr. v. Hillard M. (Mitch) Griffith La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
3 Black’s Law Dictionary (5th ed. 1979) explains that “‘servitude’ rather has relation to the burden or the estate burdened, while ‘easement’ refers to the benefit or advantage or the estate to which it accrues.” 4 So.2d 253, 259 (1969) (citation omitted), the supreme court explained: [T]he insurer’s duty to defend suits brought against its insured is determined by the allegations of the injured plaintiff’s petition, with the insurer being obligated to furnish a defense unless the petition unamb
Miller v. Superior Shipyard and Fabrication 859 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
Rollins v. Richardson 803 So. 2d 1028 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., Inc., 93-2064 (La.8/18/94), ; Yarbrough v. Federal Land Bank of Jackson, 31,815, p. 5 (La.App.2d Cir.3/31/99), .
Vaughn v. Franklin 785 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
Hodge v. Austin 732 So. 2d 608 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
(1969); Gleason v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 27,297 (La.
Yarbrough v. Federal Land Bank of Jackson 731 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Steptore v. Masco Const. Co., 93-2064 (La.8/18/94), ; , (1969); Gleason v. State Farm Mut.
Singleton v. United Tugs, Inc. 710 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Milano v. BOARD OF COMR'S OF ORLEANS LEVEE DIST. 691 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Cooper 707 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
City of Plaquemine v. North American Constructors, Inc. 683 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Meloy v. Conoco, Inc., 504 So.2d at 838 , , (1969).