DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Taylor, 229 So. 2d 95.

13 citing documents.

  • STATE of Louisiana v. Calvin Louis NOEL, III AKA Calvin Noel 236 So. 3d 523 La. 2017
    Notably, that jurisprudence includes State v. 3 Taylor, So.2d 95 (1970) (La.
  • State v. Mickelson 210 So. 3d 893 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
    * * [ 3 ] , (1970), the coroner, who was not a psychiatrist, testified that, at the time of the offense, the defendant had schizophrenia, was experiencing a psychotic episode and did not have insight into what was happening at the time of the offense.
  • State of Louisiana v. Calvin Louis Noel, III AKA - Calvin Noel La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2015
    So.2d 95 (1970), it had reversed Taylor’s conviction, finding the trial court erred in denying a motion to change plea filed on the day of trial.
  • State v. Noel 181 So. 3d 223 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
    1051 , (1970), it had reversed Taylor’s conviction, finding the trial court erred in denying a motion .to change plea filed on the day of trial.
  • State v. Miller 964 So. 2d 911 La. 2007
    Turning to the jurisprudence evaluating Article 561, , (1970), which was also a capital case, [20] this court reversed defendant's conviction when finding trial court error in denying the motion to change plea filed on the day of trial.
  • State of Louisiana v. Lekeithen Shondell Harris La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2006
    4 Cir. 1986) ( So.2d 95 (1970); ).
  • State v. Harris 924 So. 2d 1184 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
    4 Cir.1986) ( , (1970); ).
  • State v. Mercer 564 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
  • State v. Whiticar 487 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Sampson 480 So. 2d 952 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Baldwin 388 So. 2d 664 La. 1980
    where there was both lay and medical evidence of insanity.
  • State v. Delpit 341 So. 2d 876 La. 1977
    (1970), we reversed a conviction on the finding that the trial judge abused his discretion in refusing to allow defendant on the day of trial to change a plea of "not guilty" to a combined plea of "not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity."
  • State v. George 263 So. 2d 339 La. 1972