Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Reymond v. State Ex Rel. Department of Highways, 231 So. 2d 375.

92 citing documents.

Sean Herigodt and Project Nemo, L3c v. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Dr. Shawn D. Wilson in … La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2025
1992); Reymond v. State, Through the Dep’t of Highways, So.
Watson Memorial Spiritual Temple of Christ D/B/A Watson Memorial Teaching Ministries, Charlotte Brancaforte, Elio Brancaforte, Benito Brancaforte, Josephine … La. 2024
Additionally, in State through Department of Transportation & Development v. Chambers Investment Company, Inc., (citing Reymond v. State, Through the Dep’t of Highways, (1970)), 8 we opined that “the action for inverse condemnation arises out of the self-executing nature of the constitutional command to pay just compensation.” Indeed, given this common constitutional mandate, a finding that mandamus may lie for a taking via expropriation, but not for a taking by means of inv
Frank Labruzzo, Bernard D' Arcangelo, Mary Rose Labruzzo D' Arcangelo, Clarissa M. Balfour Trust, Clarissa M. Balfour, Trustee … La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2024
App. 1 Cir. 5/4/12), 2012WL1580760, So.2d 375 (La.
Southland Engine Company, Inc. v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Transportation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2022
In Constance, the supreme court, quoting from Reymond v. State, Through the Department of Highways, So.2d 375 (1970), stated: The liability of a public body in such case, however, has been limited “to those instances where there is a physical taking or damage to property or a special damage peculiar to the particular property and 7 not general damage sustained by other property similarly located.” Reymond
Sid-Mar's Restaurant & Lounge, Inc. v. State ex rel. Governor 182 So. 3d 390 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Nor were general damages al-lowéd when, through “oversight or lack of foresight,” the'State failed to expropriate the plaintiffs property that was adjacent to other, expropriated property for a highway construction project ( , ).
St. Charles Land Co. II v. City of New Orleans ex rel. New Orleans Aviation Board 167 So. 3d 128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2014
& Dev., , -47 (La.1970).
Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University & Agricultural & Mechanical College v. 2330 Palmyra Street, L.L.C. 80 So. 3d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
and Development, Office of Hwys.
City of New Orleans v. Badine Land Ltd. 985 So. 2d 832 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2008
and Development, Office of Hwys.
SDS, Inc. v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 978 So. 2d 1013 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
and |4 Development, , (1970).
Suire v. Lafayette City-Parish Government 907 So. 2d 37 La. 2005
Such an action is often referred to as `inverse condemnation' ....'") ( , ).
Roy v. Belt 868 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Reymond [v. State Through Dep't of Highways, , ] (emphasis added).
Lillian E. Landaiche Roy v. Sheriff Bill Belt La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
ion, explaining: “[S]ince a taking or damaging of property may in fact occur without expropriation proceedings by a public body through oversight or lack of foresight, there must be some proceeding whereby an owner may seek redress when his property is damaged or taken without the proper exercise of eminent domain.” Reymond [v. State Through Dep’t of Highways, So.2d 375, 383 (La.1970)] (emphasis added).
Avenal v. State, Dept. of Natural Resources 858 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2003
Chambers, 595 So.2d at 602; Reymond v. State, Through the Department of Highways, , (1970).
Perron v. Telecable Associates, Inc. 784 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
The Reymond[ , 231 So2d 375 (1970)] Court found that “[djamages which cause discomfort, disturbance, inconve *854 nience, and even sometimes financial loss as an ordinary and general consequence of public improvements are not compensable, and are considered dam-num absque injuria [loss without injury in the legal sense].” Id.
Lodestro Co. v. City of Shreveport 768 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
Reymond v. State, Through Dept. of Highways, , (1970); Taylor v. State Through Dept. of Transportation and Development, 95-1318 (La.App.
Estate of Patout v. City of New Iberia 738 So. 2d 544 La. 1999
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, 98-1981 (La.4/13/99), ; , (1970).
LaSalle v. Iberia Parish Council 741 So. 2d 812 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
See e.g., Reymond v. State Through Dep’t of Highways, , (1970).
Mossy Motors v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 753 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 731 So. 2d 240 La. 1999
We recognized a , (1970).
Audubon Trace Condominium Ass'n v. Smith 722 So. 2d 1114 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
that article observes, "The matter of classification of building restrictions has given rise to analytical difficulties in Louisiana.” We find it doubtful, however, that these covenants would be classed as servitudes: "Man’s activities are not the subject of predial servitudes, for it is an estate and not man which is subservient to a servitude.” Reymond v. State, Through Department of Highways, , (1970).
Williams v. City of Baton Rouge 715 So. 2d 15 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Reymond v. State, Dep't of Highways, , (1970).
Tournillon v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 689 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Reymond v. State, through Dep't of Highways, , (1970).
Lambert v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. 683 So. 2d 839 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways [ ]
Ardoin v. State, Dept. of Transp. 679 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Reymond [ v. State Through Dept. of Highways, ], 231 So.2d [375] at 383 [(1970)].
Taylor v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 670 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Citing Reymond v. State, Through the Department of Highways, , (1970), and Constance v. State, Through DOTD, he argues that to recover, a landowner is required only to identify damages particular to his property.
Avenal v. State, Dept. of Nat. Resources 668 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
Co., citing Reymond v. State, Dept. of Highways, , (1970).
Rivet v. STATE, DOTD 635 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways [ ]
Saucier v. State, Department of Transportation & Development 635 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways [ ]
Constance v. State, Through DOTD 626 So. 2d 1151 La. 1993
Chambers, 595 So.2d at 602 ; Reymond v. State, Through the Department of Highways, , (1970).
LeBlanc v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development, Office of Highways 626 So. 2d 1151 La. 1993
Chambers, 595 So.2d at 602 ; Reymond v. State, Through the Department of Highways, , (1970).
LeBlanc v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 615 So. 2d 365 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways
Naquin v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. OF STATE 604 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
See also: Reymond v. State, DOH, , (1970).
Mathis v. City of DeRidder 599 So. 2d 378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Among some of the more important Louisiana cases recognizing and applying the doctrine of appropriation are: Reymond v. State, Department of Highways, , (1970); (La.App.
State Through DOTD v. Chambers Inv. Co. 595 So. 2d 598 La. 1992
See Reymond v. State, Dept. of Highways, , (1970).
Parish of Jefferson v. Tassin 594 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1992
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways
Harrington v. Southwestern Elec. Power Co. 567 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways, , (1970); Dickie's Sportsman's Centers, (La.App.
Diefenthal v. Longue Vue Management Corp. 561 So. 2d 44 La. 1990
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways, , (1970).
Bowden v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev. 556 So. 2d 1343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Reymond v. State, Through the Department of Highways, , , and authorities therein cited.
Hawthorne v. Louisiana Dept. of Public Works 540 So. 2d 1261 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
(1970); La.Const.1974, Art. 1, § 4.
In re the Succession of LaBorde 540 So. 2d 966 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Reymond v. State, Dept. of Highways, , (1970).
Ursin v. New Orleans Aviation Bd. 506 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways
Dickie's Sportsman's Centers, Inc. v. DEPT. OF TRANSP. AND DEV. 477 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways, , (1970); Gray v. State, Department of Highways, 250 La.
Matherne v. Terrebonne Parish Police Jury 462 So. 2d 274 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
In Reymond v. State, Department of Highways, , (1970), the Louisiana Supreme Court states, "Since a taking or damaging of property may in fact occur without expropriation proceedings by a public body through oversight or lack of foresight, there must be some proceeding whereby an owner may seek redress when his property is damaged or take
Acadian Heritage Realty v. City of Lafayette 434 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
GENERAL DAMAGES Defendant contends that it is not liable for general damages under the holding of Reymond v. State, Department of Highways, , (La.
State, Dept. of Highways v. Bitterwolf 415 So. 2d 196 La. 1982
Reymond v. State, Dept. of Highways, , (1970).
Wetzka v. Big Three Industries, Inc. 409 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
1 , (1971), , (1970), in those statements by that court regarding LSA-C.C.
Daniel v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP. & DEVELOPMENT 396 So. 2d 967 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways, , (1970), rehearing denied 1970; (La.App.
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP., ETC. v. Van Willet 389 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Reymond v. State, Department of Highways, (La.
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Ellender 391 So. 2d 1234 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
The holding of Reymond v. State of Louisiana, Through the Department of Highways, is applicable to the present case.
Semon v. City of Shreveport 389 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
App.2d Cir. 1978) and the Supreme Court decision in Reymond v. State, Dept. of Highways, , (1970), and that damages for mental anguish and inconvenience are not allowable under these decisions.