Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., 230 So. 2d 74.

25 citing documents.

Kathleen Edigo and David Edigo v. Otis Elevator Company La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
See Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., So.2d 74 (1969), cited with approval in Mundy, supra, 593 So.2d at 350.
Explained Sislo v. New Orleans Center for Creative Arts 198 So. 3d 1202 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
A random act of violence could occur anywhere, but a defect ⅛ the premises at the place of employment is ‘peculiar and distinctive’ to that location.” Id., 93-1898 at p. 4, 637 So.2d at 1159 (citing Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969)(cited with approval in Mundy, 593 So.2d at 350 )).
Stewart v. Boh Bros. Construction Co. 128 So. 3d 398 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
Plaintiff claims that the factual circumstances of his case are similar to the facts in Templet v. Intracoastal Track Line, Inc., , (1969).
Edward L. Williams, Sr. v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2011
3/22/02), So.2d 74 (1969).
Williams v. PILGRIM'S PRIDE CORP. 68 So. 3d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Robinson v. Brown, 35,430 (La.App.2d Cir.12/19/01), , writ denied, 2002-0912 (La.3/22/02), ; , (1969).
Distinguished Posey v. NOMAC DRILLING CORP. 16 So. 3d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
2d Cir.12/19/01), , writ denied, 2002-0912 (La.3/22/02), ; , (1969).
Cindi Babineaux v. Pnk (Lake Charles), LLC, L'Auberge Du Lac Hotel & Casino La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
W. Malone & H. Johnson, supra, at § 169; see Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., So.2d 74 (1969) (compensation denied when the employee was injured in a collision while making a left turn in his vehicle from the highway onto his employer’s premises, because the highway risk was not shown to be a peculiar and distinctive one encountered by the employee to a greater
Babineaux v. PNK (Lake Charles), L.L.C. 6 So. 3d 939 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
W. Malone & H. Johnson, supra, at § 169; see Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969) (compensation denied when the employee was injured in a collision while making a left turn in his vehicle from the highway onto his employer’s premises, because the highway risk was not shown to be a peculiar and distinctive one encountered by the employee to a greater extent or frequency than by
Harris v. State ex rel. Department of Public Safety & Corrections 950 So. 2d 795 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2006
(citing Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969)).
Boyte v. Ward North American Insurance Co. 818 So. 2d 293 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969).
Robinson v. Brown 803 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
May v. SISTERS OF CHARITY OF INCARNATE WORD 651 So. 2d 375 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
Mundy v. Department of Health and Human Resources, supra ; Stewart v. Louisiana Plant Service, Inc., supra ; Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., (La.App.
Pappas v. Marine Spill Response Corp. 650 So. 2d 441 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Id., citing Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969).
Francisco v. Harris Management Co. 643 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
See Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969), cited with approval in Mundy, supra, 593 So.2d at 350 .
Bosse v. Westinghouse Elec., Inc. 637 So. 2d 1157 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
See Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969), cited with approval in Mundy, supra, 593 So.2d at 350 .
Stewart v. Louisiana Plant Service Inc. 611 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1992
Mundy v. Dept. of Health & Human Resources 593 So. 2d 346 La. 1992
Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969).
Harris v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. 485 So. 2d 965 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
3d Cir.1980), writ denied, Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969).
Guidry v. Chevron USA, Inc. 461 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
See generally, Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969).
Name Unpublished v. Southern Baptist Hospital 415 So. 2d 993 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
We note that the general rule on the threshold doctrine is that it does not apply to every employee on a public way adjacent to the entry to the employer’s premises, , (1969).
Mouton v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 389 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
The Court has noted, particularly, the case of Templet versus Intracoastal Truck Line, Incorporated, cited at , and also a more recent Court of Appeal, Third Circuit case, Fife versus Allied Supermarkets, Incorporated, reported at .
Thomasee v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 385 So. 2d 1219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
[2] The Louisiana Supreme Court in explaining the requirement of a distinctive travel risk in Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Lines, Inc., , (1969), said the risk must be one "to which the employee is regularly and peculiarly exposed by reason of his employment to which the public generally, albeit also subjected to such hazard, is not usually exposed to the extent of the employee."
Chancellor v. Schwegmann Bros. Giant Super Markets, Inc 363 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
One of the exceptions to that rule is the threshold or proximity rule as recognized and established in the case of Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc.
Fife v. Allied Super Markets, Inc. 284 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
In a case, Templet v. Intracoastal Truck Line, Inc., , (1969), stronger for that plaintiff than is the instant case, the Supreme Court held there should be no recovery.
Sonnier v. Travelers Insurance Co. 231 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
In the recent case of Templet v. Intra-coastal Truck Line, Inc., et al., La., , bearing docket number 49,734, decided by our State Supreme Court on December 15, 1968, that court, by unanimous decision, held that an employee on his way to work in his automobile, who was injured while entering the premises, could not recover for workmen’s compensation.