DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. O'BRIEN, 232 So. 2d 484.

22 citing documents.

  • Criticized State v. McElroy 553 So. 2d 456 La. 1989
    13:3714 [2] makes the hospital record admissible as an exception to the hearsay rule, , (1970).
  • State v. Mayeux 526 So. 2d 1243 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
  • State v. Berluchaux 522 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Looking at the cases submitted by Mr. Bankston in support of the introduction and use of the medical records, I do feel that the case of State versus Bruins, 315 So.2nd, 293, 1975, and, also, the case of State versus O'Brien, [ ] 232 So.2nd, 484, 1970, would be controlling.
  • State v. Lee 446 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
  • State v. Goiner 410 So. 2d 1085 La. 1982
    982 , (1970); , (1970); State v. Williams, 250 La.
  • State v. Carter 383 So. 2d 357 La. 1980
  • State v. Walker 376 So. 2d 92 La. 1979
    [4] , (1970), where the accused, suffering from withdrawal symptoms due to drug addiction, asked to be taken to Charity Hospital following his arrest for possession of morphine.
  • Criticized State v. Monroe 345 So. 2d 1185 La. 1977
    Although introduction of evidence under this statute against criminal defendants was not found to be reversible error in two cases, , (1970) (criticized in Work of the *1188 Louisiana Appellate Courts, 1969-70 Term —Evidence, 31 La.L.Rev.
  • Commitment of Malvo 343 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    See State v. O’Brien, , (1970).
  • State v. Wientjes 341 So. 2d 390 La. 1976
  • State v. Trahan 332 So. 2d 218 La. 1976
  • State v. Bruins 315 So. 2d 293 La. 1975
    3rd Cir. 1969) , (1970).
  • State v. Knight 298 So. 2d 726 La. 1974
    982 , (1970); , (1970); State v. Williams, 250 La.
  • State v. Porter 296 So. 2d 302 La. 1974
    982 , (1970); , (1970); State v. Williams, 250 La.
  • State v. Taylor 282 So. 2d 491 La. 1973
    we held that the right conferred under LSA-R.S.
  • State v. Pope 273 So. 2d 272 La. 1973
    See, e. g.: State v. O’Brien, , (1970) (unlawful possession of narcotics); State v. Douglas, 256 La.
  • State v. Hightower 272 So. 2d 363 La. 1973
  • State v. Crittle 268 So. 2d 604 La. 1972
    64 , (1967); , (1970); State v. Kreller, 255 La.
  • State v. Arnold 249 So. 2d 552 La. 1971
    743 , ; State v. O’Brien, , .
  • State v. Williams 248 So. 2d 295 La. 1971
  • State v. Greenbaum 244 So. 2d 832 La. 1971
    (State v. O’Brien, , [1970]).
  • State v. Carey 240 So. 2d 733 La. 1970
    Art. 162) and constitutional (State v. O’Brien, , ; Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 1969 ) tests of validity.