DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., 235 So. 2d 386.

118 citing documents.

  • Watkins v. Waller Oil Co. 341 So. 2d 1264 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , Walters Air Conditioning Company, Inc. v. Firemen’s Fund Insurance Company, (La.App.
  • Townsend v. Cleve Heyl Chevrolet-Buick, Inc. 318 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    [2] An earlier characterization of attorney fees as "liquidated damages" as distinguished from "penalties" , (1970).
  • Gauthreaux v. Gauthreaux 315 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , (1970).
  • Charles C. Cloy, General Contractors, Inc. v. DiVincenti Brothers, Inc. 308 So. 2d 495 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    App. 4th Cir. 1969) modified , (1970): "It is also well settled that even if the owner proves the existence of the defects or omissions and the cost of repairing them, he is nevertheless barred from recovering the cost thereof if he accepted the work despite the patent defects or imperfections discoverable upon reasonable inspection
  • Lambert v. JONES-McCLOSKEY CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 311 So. 2d 488 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    NOTES [1] See Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., La.App., , reversed on other grounds, , ; Airco Refrigeration Service, Inc. v. Fink, 242 La.
  • Palmer v. Asaff 297 So. 2d 487 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    4th Cir. 1969) modified , (1970): “It is also well settled that even if the owner proves the existence of the defects or omissions and the cost of repairing them, he is nevertheless barred from recovering the cost thereof if he accepted the work despite the patent defects or imperfections discoverable upon reasonable inspection
  • Hebert v. Mayeur and Company, Inc. 296 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , (1970)
  • Town of Winnsboro v. Barnard & Burk, Inc. 294 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    4th Cir. 1969) modified , (1970); Day v. National U. S. Radiator Corporation, 241 La.
  • Fleming v. Louisiana Department of Education 293 So. 2d 658 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , (1970).
  • Diesel Engine Repairs, Inc. v. Point Landing, Inc. 291 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    See Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , (1970) (La.App.
  • National American Bank v. SOUTHCOAST CONTR., INC. 276 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    The parties litigant both cite the case of Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , (1970) in support of their opposing views on the subject of attorney fees.
  • Sons v. Baron Construction Co. 261 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    163 , (1971); and Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , (1970), decreed that a surety company is liable for the stipulated percentage of attorney’s fees for which it bound itself as surety in its intervention in the building contract.
  • Lloyd v. Merit Loan Company of Shreveport, Inc. 253 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
    In the recent case of Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , *120 (rehearing denied June 8, 1970), the Supreme Court stated: "It is well recognized in the jurisprudence of this Court that as a general rule attorney's fees are not allowed except where authorized by statute or contract.
  • WALTERS AIR CONDITION. CO., INC. v. Firemen's Fund Ins. Co. 252 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
    389 , (1958), and Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , (1970), particularly the dissenting opinion of Justice Barham in the latter case.
  • Slaughter v. Roddie 249 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1971
    We think the trial judge was in error in allowing attorney fees for, as stated in the case of Kenny (Maloney) v. Oak Builders, Inc., , : "It is well recognized in the jurisprudence of this Court that as a general rule attorney's fees are not allowed except where authorized by statute or contract.
  • Elite Homes, Inc. v. Herrmann 242 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    The very recent Supreme Court case of Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , , is applicable to the question of attorney's fees due by the surety.
  • Popich v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. 245 So. 2d 394 La. 1971
    A similar claim for attorney’s fees, based on the surety contract, was before this court in Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , (1970).
  • Pooler Building Materials, Inc. v. Hogan 244 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Maloney v. Oak Builders, Inc., , (1970).