Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Sun Sales Co. v. Hodges, 237 So. 2d 684.

15 citing documents.

Hibernia National Bank v. Aero-Mech, Inc. 215 So. 3d 350 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
Michael Nelson v. Corbert Dinger, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
So.2d 684,(1970); (La.App.
Tower Credit, Inc. v. Carpenter 825 So. 2d 1125 La. 2002
Smetherman v. Wilson Oil Co. 635 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
See, for example, Sun Sales Co., , (La.App.
Unified Teachers Credit Plan, Inc. v. Walker 491 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Plaintiff contends that the commencement date for such judgment should have been December 1, 1981, the first month after the employee’s prior wage assignment was satisfied, , (1970).
Farrell v. Farrell 446 So. 2d 790 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Bridgeman & Conway v. Korner Realty Co., Inc. 405 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
However, , (1970): "The garnishee strongly contends here, as it did in the Court of Appeal, that the seizure affects no future wages, relying upon the decision of this Court in Humphrey v. Midkiff, 122 La.
Johnson v. Fulwood 398 So. 2d 1151 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
the court characterized the garnishee as the legal custodian of the garnished funds of the judgment debtor.
Associates Financial Services, Inc. v. McClendon 367 So. 2d 91 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Scariano Bros. v. Backhaus 359 So. 2d 1036 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Dunckelman Distributing Company, Inc. v. Hyde 334 So. 2d 236 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Owen v. Owen 335 So. 2d 529 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
13:3923; , (1970); Dunckelman, supra .
Seaboard Finance Corp. v. Anderson 305 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Grand v. Kado 279 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
e court of competent jurisdiction in which the garnishment proceedings may be pending fixing the portion of such wage, salary, commission or other compensation as may be exempt, as provided by law and providing for the payment to the seizing creditor, of whatever sum for which judgment may be obtained, out of the portion of such compensation which is not exempt.” In Sun Sales Co., , , the Supreme Court held that under the provisions of LSA-C.
Hooter v. Wilson 256 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
4th Cir. 1969) aff’d , (1970) confirms the view that plaintiff had a vested, substantive right of seizure.