Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Davis v. Royal-Globe Insurance Companies, 242 So. 2d 839.

27 citing documents.

Winchell v. Johnson Properties, Inc. 640 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Tillman v. Johnson 610 So. 2d 866 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
However none of these cases espousing a more modern view overrule the two Louisiana lead paint cases, , (1970); (La.App.
Mayer v. Tulane Medical Center 527 So. 2d 329 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
4th Cir.1969), reversed on other grounds, , cert.
Griffin v. Foti 523 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
4th Cir.1970)] with the stricter interpretation given in the Davis case [ , ], we have concluded that the failure of the elevator in the instant case is within the stricter definition of the word `ruin'."
Bowles v. Litton Industries, Inc. 518 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Jackson v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 478 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
4th Cir.1969) rev'd on other grounds, , (1970), a suit by the natural father of a minor child was held to have interrupted prescription on a later claim made by the child's court-appointed tutor.
Sumner v. Foremost Ins. Co. 417 So. 2d 1327 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
1 Cir. 1980), writ denied, , (1970); (La.App.
Brown v. Soupenne 416 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Fonseca v. Marlin Marine Corp. 410 So. 2d 674 La. 1981
Macalusa v. Pitt Grill, Inc. 388 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Davis v. Royal-Globe Insurance *99 Companies, , (1970); (La.
Olsen v. Shell Oil Co. 365 So. 2d 1285 La. 1978
Marquez v. City Stores Co. 363 So. 2d 1287 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
4th Cir. 1970), we found Art. 2322 applicable in the case where the cause of plaintiff’s injury was a defective electrical switch on an elevator, , (1971).
Leaber v. Jolley Elevator Corp. 354 So. 2d 746 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
(1971), the court held that the "ruin" contemplated by Art. 2322 "has reference to the actual fall or collapse of a building or one of its components," and declined to apply the article to a condition wherein paint was flaking and dropping from a building's ceiling.
Tardo v. NEW ORLEANS PUBLIC SERV., INC. 353 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
(1971) the Court considered a landlord's liability under Art. 2322 to his tenant's child who became ill from eating flakes of lead based paint.
Reed v. Ramsay 355 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Companies, , (1971); (La.
Straley v. Calongne Drayage & Storage, Inc. 337 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Glorioso v. Chandler 337 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
Hornsby v. Ray 327 So. 2d 146 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Loescher v. Parr 324 So. 2d 441 La. 1975
Parker v. Brawley 306 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
(1970), wherein the court stated: "This is the attitude in the French law and it is a view expressed in Guidry v. Hamlin, 188 So.
Natal v. PHOENIX ASSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK 286 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Smolinski v. Taulli 285 So. 2d 577 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
4th Cir. 1969) reversed on other grounds, , (1970); (La.App.
Sparks v. American Mutual Liability Insurance 287 So. 2d 654 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1970), in order for the article to be applicable there must be a collapse or fall or breaking or giving way of a more or less substantial component of the building.
Weiland v. King 281 So. 2d 688 La. 1973
Crawford v. Wheless 265 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
Weiland v. King 262 So. 2d 50 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
With reference to Article 2322 , at 841 , 842 that: “The 'ruin’ contemplated by this Article has reference to the actual fall or collapse of a building or one of its components.
Jarvis v. Prout 247 So. 2d 244 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971