DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Manuel v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 236 So. 2d 807.

15 citing documents.

  • Lawson v. Straus 684 So. 2d 959 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
  • Fontana v. Zurich Ins. Co. 430 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
  • Distinguished Boudreaux v. Verret 422 So. 2d 1167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    4th Cir. 1976); , (1970).
  • Distinguished Richard v. Hebert's Creamery, Inc. 415 So. 2d 668 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    4th Cir. 1976); , (1970).
  • Arledge v. Royal Globe Ins. Co. 401 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
  • Fox v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 396 So. 2d 543 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    where the Supreme Court had occasion to apply an exclusion provision found in an insurance policy which is similar to the civil immunity provision of LSA-R.S.
  • Franklin v. JA Jones Const. Co. 391 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
  • Kelley v. M AND M DODGE, INC. 370 So. 2d 1267 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    [footnote omitted] , (S.Ct.1970)
  • Credeur v. Luke 368 So. 2d 1030 La. 1979
    (1970) and Myers v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, (La.App.
  • Gregorie v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. 348 So. 2d 186 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    (1970) is the controlling case in this instance.
  • Miller v. Brown 346 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    We note first, and significantly, , (1970), wherein the Supreme Court held there was no coverage, under similar provisions, of an assistant general manager of a chain of retail stores with respect to injuries to a subordinate assistant manager of a particular store.
  • Hathorn v. CONTINENTAL BANKERS LIFE INS. CO. OF SO. 334 So. 2d 730 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    (1970), the Supreme Court faced the problem created by the narrow interpretation given to the phrase "in the course of his employment" in tort actions as opposed to the liberal interpretation given to this phrase in workmen's compensation cases.
  • Mauterer v. Associated Indem. Corp. 332 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
    [2] , (S.Ct.1970); (La.App.
  • Spain v. Travelers Insurance Company 332 So. 2d 827 La. 1976
    (1970), we held that the test to be applied in determining whether an employee's injuries were sustained in the course and scope of his employment within the terms of an exclusionary clause similar to the one involved here is the same test which is applied in determining whether the employee was injure
  • Spain v. Travelers Indemnity Company 321 So. 2d 10 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975