Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Hall, 236 So. 2d 489.

14 citing documents.

State v. Sonnier 379 So. 2d 1336 La. 1980
State v. Sterling 377 So. 2d 58 La. 1979
State v. Hollingsworth 337 So. 2d 461 La. 1976
(1970) and State v. Rideau, 249 La.
State v. Overton 337 So. 2d 1058 La. 1976
State v. Gaspard 301 So. 2d 344 La. 1974
(1970), holding: "The fact that objects or photographs constitute or portray a repulsive spectacle and tend to prejudice the jury furnish no valid grounds for their exclusion where they are otherwise relevant.
State v. Curry 292 So. 2d 212 La. 1974
State v. Gibson, La., (1973); , (1970); State v. Alexander, 252 La.
State v. Gray 286 So. 2d 644 La. 1973
(1970); State v. Hamilton, 249 La.
State v. Frezal 278 So. 2d 64 La. 1973
(1970): "* * * Undoubtedly the photographs served to prove details and clarify questions in the minds of the jury which the testimony alone could not do.
State v. McCauley 272 So. 2d 335 La. 1973
State v. Brewer 267 So. 2d 541 La. 1972
(1970), and again reiterated in State v. Maiden, 258 La.
State v. Washington 261 So. 2d 224 La. 1972
State v. Ford 254 So. 2d 457 La. 1971
417 , ; , ; State v. Washington, 256 La.
State v. Square 244 So. 2d 200 La. 1971
(1970); State v. Harrell, 228 La.
State v. Callihan 242 So. 2d 521 La. 1970