Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hancock Bank v. Alexander, 237 So. 2d 669.

25 citing documents.

Sunbelt Innovative Plastics, LLC v. Velvet Pines Developers, LLC La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2024
Walker v. Hingle 179 So. 3d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Hawthorne v. Couch 946 So. 2d 288 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2006
Joiner v. Bill Hood Ford, Inc. 843 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
The Louisiana Supreme Court has described a writ of sequestration as an “extremely harsh remedy which is only extended where the formalities of the law have been strictly and literally complied with.” (1970); (La.App.
Sarpy Properties, Inc. v. Diamond Shoe Stores of Louisiana, Inc. 761 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Succession of Davidson v. Forrest 577 So. 2d 1222 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
3rd Cir.1969), affirmed *1224 remanded on other grounds.
Eaves v. Norwel, Inc. 570 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
Banque De Depots v. Ferroligas 569 So. 2d 40 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Karageorge v. Cole 565 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
Giroir v. Giroir 536 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Bagert v. Goldsmith 504 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
4th Cir.1980), , (1970).
Strahan v. LANDIS CONST. CO., INC. 499 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
Godfrey v. Project Square 376 477 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Thus amendment to the original petition is precluded once the defendant has moved to dissolve the writ, , (1970).
Bourque v. Tyler 401 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
YORKWOOD SAVINGS AND LOAN ASS'N v. Thomas 379 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Smedes-Jardine & Co. v. Romero 376 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Furthermore, , : “When the writ of sequestration issues ex parte upon the sworn allegations of the applicant, seizure of defendant’s property *340 takes place immediately without any advance notice to him.
Menard v. Pinson 360 So. 2d 256 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
People's Nat. Bank of New Iberia v. Smith 360 So. 2d 560 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
833 (1934); General Securities Co. v. Jumonville, supra ; , (1970).
Matherne v. Estate of Matherne 341 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
A writ of sequestration can only be sustained when the formalities of the law have been strictly complied with by the party seeking the writ, , (1970); LSA-C.C.P.
Bice v. Southside Motors, Inc. 344 So. 2d 78 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1977
Hancock Bank v. Alexander 344 So. 2d 21 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
The history of this litigation is shown by the decision of this Court at (1969) and the decision of our Supreme Court at , (1970).
Dow Chemical Company v. Traigle 336 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
3rd Cir. 1969); reversed on other grounds, La., (1970), for the proposition that the introduction of a deposition on the trial of the motion for summary judgment without objection can amend or enlarge the pleadings in accordance with Article 1154 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
Margot, Inc. v. Pearson 336 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
So.2d 669 (1970), relied upon by Pearson is inapposite.
Smith v. UTILITY & MAINTENANCE CON. OF AMER., INC. 301 So. 2d 906 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
(1970): "Strict application of the rules established for the issuance of conservatory writs has been uniformly required by the Courts in the past.
WT Grant Company v. Mitchell 269 So. 2d 186 La. 1972
(1970) and Official Revision Comment (b) to Article 3510.