Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Fontenot, 235 So. 2d 75.

15 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Byran Louis Fogleman La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
(burglary); So.2d 75 (1970) (obscenity); and State v. Daniels, 236 La.
State v. Fogleman 98 So. 3d 964 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
(burglary); , (1970) (obscenity); and State v. Daniels, 236 La.
State of Louisiana v. Lill Paul Conley La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
State v. Mercante 600 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
n. 1 (La.1973); , (1970).
State v. Perret 563 So. 2d 459 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
State v. Hudnall 522 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Ruple 426 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Buttner 411 So. 2d 35 La. 1982
article 920(2), , (1970).
State v. Johnson 368 So. 2d 719 La. 1979
See, e. g., (burglary); , (1970) (obscenity); and State v. Daniels, 236 La.
City of New Orleans v. Owen 355 So. 2d 1297 La. 1978
(1970), this Court overturned a conviction for indecent exposure where the bill of information omitted an allegation that the act was committed with the requisite ‘intent of arousing sexual desire,’ stating: “ ‘Basic law in our state and throughout this nation requires that the facts which constitute ea
State v. Williams 346 So. 2d 181 La. 1977
State v. Elzie 343 So. 2d 712 La. 1977
(burglary); , (1970) (obscenity); and State v. Daniels, 236 La.
City of New Orleans v. Hollis 329 So. 2d 681 La. 1976
(1970), this Court overturned a conviction for indecent exposure where the bill of information omitted an allegation that the act was committed with the requisite “intent of arousing sexual desire,” stating: “Basic law in our state and throughout this nation requires that the facts which constitute each
State v. Edwards 283 So. 2d 231 La. 1973
State v. Smith 275 So. 2d 733 La. 1973
See, e. g.: , (1970) (obscenitydidn't charge specific intent); State v. George, 247 La.