Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Lacoste, 237 So. 2d 871.

63 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. William Muse La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2023
State v. Shoupe 215 So. 3d 345 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2016
State of Louisiana v. Cleveland Troy Bias La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Const. art. I, § 17; So.2d 871 (1970).
State of Louisiana v. Catrina L. Wallace La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
Const. art. I, § 17; So.2d 871 (1970).
State v. Wallace 92 So. 3d 592 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Const. art. I, § 17; , (1970).
State v. WALSTRUM 36 So. 3d 321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
State of Louisiana v. Levi Joseph Garrick La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
art. I, § 17; So.2d 871 (1970).
State v. Garrick 879 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
Const. art. I, § 17; , (1970).
State v. Garrick 879 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2004
Const. art. I, § 17; , (1970).
State v. Hutchinson 817 So. 2d 500 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2002
State v. Schmidt 771 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Const. art. I, § 17; , (1970).
State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Palermo 765 So. 2d 1139 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2000
State v. Debrow 763 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
See, , (1970); State v. Davis, 92-1623 (La.5/23/94), , cert.
State v. Chambers 758 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Const. Art. I, § 17; , (1970).
State v. Lewis 724 So. 2d 830 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
State v. Pickney 714 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State v. Stacy 665 So. 2d 390 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
(1970) (emphasis added).
State v. Battle 635 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967); , (1970).
State v. Lee 625 So. 2d 645 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Previously, , (1970), a surveillance videotape of a bank robbery was found admissible, and the Supreme Court ruled it was for the jury to decide whether or not it bore upon the guilt or innocence of the accused.
State v. Carmouche 508 So. 2d 792 La. 1987
State v. Garmouche 508 So. 2d 792 La. 1987
State v. Foster 437 So. 2d 309 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Matter of Rozas Gibson Pharmacy of Eunice, Inc. 382 So. 2d 929 La. 1980
1976), exhibiting teeth; , (La.
State v. Leggett 363 So. 2d 434 La. 1978
State v. Robertson, supra ; , (1970).
State v. Robertson 358 So. 2d 931 La. 1978
State v. Cass, supra ; State v. Freetime, supra ; , (1970).
State v. Anderson 358 So. 2d 276 La. 1978
State v. Robinson 353 So. 2d 1001 La. 1977
State v. Thomason 353 So. 2d 235 La. 1977
State v. Cass 356 So. 2d 936 La. 1977
State v. Freetime, supra ; , (1970).
State v. Tillett 351 So. 2d 1153 La. 1977
So.2d 871 (1970), we held that the state could compel a defendant in an armed robbery case to say the words used by the robber ("Hurry up") without any infringement of the privilege against self-incrimination, saying that the words were: "for the purpose of voice identification by the witness .
State v. Forbes 348 So. 2d 983 La. 1977
State v. Rittiner 341 So. 2d 307 La. 1977
State v. Cascote [Lacoste], , (1970).
State v. Bennett 341 So. 2d 847 La. 1976
(1970); State v. Schoonover, 252 La.
State ex rel. Lacoste v. Maggio 338 So. 2d 297 La. 1976
State v. Freetime 334 So. 2d 207 La. 1976
State ex rel. LaCoste v. Phelps 332 So. 2d 484 La. 1976
Most of the contentions urged have been considered and rejected on the appeal, , (1970) and the other contentions present no basis for post-conviction relief.
State v. Alexander 328 So. 2d 144 La. 1976
State v. Gibson, La., (1973); , (1970); State v. Ford, 259 La.
State v. Williams 326 So. 2d 815 La. 1976
(1970), this court held that a good faith technical violation of Article 768 will only result in rejecting the State's evidence when the noncompliance has been prejudicial to the defendant.
State v. Stewart 325 So. 2d 819 La. 1976
State v. O'CONNER 320 So. 2d 188 La. 1975
422 , (1972), defendant compelled to stand to be identified; , (1970), defendant compelled to utter "Hurry up" for voice identification; State v. Thompson, 256 La.
State v. Major 318 So. 2d 19 La. 1975
15:435; , (1970); State v. Melerine, 236 La.
State v. Sneed 316 So. 2d 372 La. 1975
(1970); State v. Rodgers, 251 La.
State v. Owens 301 So. 2d 591 La. 1974
State v. Coates 273 So. 2d 282 La. 1973
(1970), that the circumstances connected with these bills, and the mandate given to us under La.C.Cr.P.
State v. Gibson 271 So. 2d 868 La. 1973
(1970); State v. Ford, 259 La.
State v. Curry 270 So. 2d 484 La. 1972
(1970); State v. Kreller, 255 La.
State v. Sheppard 268 So. 2d 590 La. 1972
State v. Mehan 264 So. 2d 581 La. 1972
State v. Cleary 263 So. 2d 882 La. 1972
See dissents in State v. Himel, supra, , (1970).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by