Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite American Creosote Company v. Springer, 241 So. 2d 510.

41 citing documents.

Bass v. Coupel 671 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Tuttle v. DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORR. 579 So. 2d 1150 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
Wilkinson v. LaFranz 574 So. 2d 403 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
Davis v. McGlothin 524 So. 2d 1320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
In this regard, , (1970), which, in dicta, specifically disapproved the practice of considering documents attached to pleadings in judging the validity of an exception of no cause of action.
Lagarde v. Allstate Ins. Co. 515 So. 2d 1147 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
Boykin v. Foster 493 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
In this regard, , (1970), which, in dicta, specifically disapproved the practice of considering documents attached to pleadings in judging the validity of an exception of no cause of action.
Blanchard v. Naquin 476 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
4th Cir.1969), affirmed , (1970).
Bavido v. Weixel 459 So. 2d 701 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
First Nat. Bank of Ruston v. Mercer 448 So. 2d 1369 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
249 , (1942); , (1970); (La.App.
Ferace v. Fullerton 425 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Lemieux v. Prudential Ins. Co. 416 So. 2d 1347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
art. 931; , (1970), evidence may be properly considered by the court in this regard where it is admitted without objection.
Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc. v. Sumrall 415 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
McNamara v. Electrode Corp. 418 So. 2d 652 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
*660 , (1970) in support of its position.
Gravois v. Ockmond 409 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
art. 931; , American Bank & Trust Company v. French, supra.” (Emphasis ours.)
Graffagnino v. Lifestyles, Inc. 402 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
152 , Benoit v. Acadia Fuel & *744 Oil Distributors, Inc., (3rd Cir. 1975), writ refused, American Creosote Co., , (La.
Krawfish Kitchen Restaurant, Inc. v. Ardoin 396 So. 2d 990 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
PHAC Services, Inc. v. Seaways Intern., Inc. 393 So. 2d 117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
railroad trackage, , (1970); a tractor shed and poultry house, Prevot v. Courtney, 241 La.
LaBorde v. Haynes 398 So. 2d 5 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Clark v. Clark 377 So. 2d 544 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
Carruth Mortgage Corp. v. F & B Builders, Inc. 369 So. 2d 1159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
However, , (1970), the Court held that if “a thing is immovable by nature, it is immovable as to everyone.” Specifically included were vendors of an item which has become immovable by nature, who were held to have lost their vendor’s lien and privilege for that reason.
Guillory v. Louisiana Insurance Rating Commission 357 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Fayard v. McCall 355 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Marchand v. Estate of Loga 354 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
*579 1080 , (1972); , (1970); LSA-C.C.P.
Marchand v. Armstrong 354 So. 2d 581 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
1080 , (1972); , (1970); Leidenheimer v. Schutten, 194 So.
Smith v. Bickley 348 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Haskins v. Clary 346 So. 2d 193 La. 1977
Bamber Contractors, Inc. v. Henderson Bros., Inc. 345 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
art. 931; , American Bank & Trust Company v. French, supra .
Parks v. Winnfield Life Insurance Company 336 So. 2d 1021 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
(1970) the Court unanimously held that only the well-pleaded facts in plaintiff's petition, or documents attached thereto or made a part thereof, could be considered in ruling on an exception of no cause of action.
Jackson v. D'AUBIN 338 So. 2d 575 La. 1976
(1970); Ewald v. Hodges, 239 La.
Mire v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. 338 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Honeycutt v. Town of Boyce 327 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
Musser v. Copping 325 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
(S.Ct.1973); American Creosote Co., , (S.Ct.1970).
Distinguished North Central Utilities, Inc. v. Sarver 323 So. 2d 173 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Benoit v. Acadia Fuel & Oil Distributors, Inc. 315 So. 2d 842 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
American Creosote Company, , (1970).
Guillory v. Nicklos Oil & Gas Co. 315 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Parr v. DH Holmes Co., Ltd. 311 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
(1970); Borenstein v. Joseph Fein Caterers, Inc., et al, , Court of Appeal, 4th Circuit, docket number 6668, decision handed down on February 13, 1975.
Borenstein v. Joseph Fein Caterers, Inc. 308 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
If there is any doubt as to this proposition since the adoption of Code of Civil Procedure Art. 931, , , on page 512 (1970), in which the court said: "[1] Although the result reached by the Court of Appeal is not affected by our views on this question, because of several references in its opinion and in briefs to facts and documents which form no part of the petition, it should be observed at the outset
Louisiana Milk Com'n v. Louisiana Com'n on Gov. Eth. 298 So. 2d 285 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1970); American Bank & (La.
Rebman v. Reed 286 So. 2d 341 La. 1973
Cf. American Creosote Company, , (1970).
Bailey v. Kruithoff 280 So. 2d 262 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
Some of the various objects which have been included within the definition of "other constructions" under Article 464 are: railroad trackage, , (1970); a tractor shed and poultry house, Prevot v. Courtney, 241 La.
Stanfill v. Johnson 258 So. 2d 141 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
66 (1937); American Creosote Co., , (1970).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by