DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Square, 268 So. 2d 229.

12 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Tyrone Mitchell La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    2871, 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, So.2d 229 (1972) (“Voir dire examination is designed to test the competence and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial.”).
  • State v. Mitchell 125 So. 3d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, , (1972) (“Voir dire examination is designed to test the competence and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial.”).
  • State v. Parker 76 So. 3d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, , (1972); State v. Smith, 216 La.
  • State v. Holmes 5 So. 3d 42 La. 2008
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, , (1972); State v. Smith, 216 La.
  • State v. Ball 824 So. 2d 1089 La. 2002
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, , (1972)("Voir dire examination is designed to test the competence and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial"); State v. Smith, 216 La.
  • State v. Tilley 767 So. 2d 6 La. 2000
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, , (1972) (" Voir dire examination is designed to test the competence and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial.").
  • State v. Thibodeaux 750 So. 2d 916 La. 1999
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, , (1972); State v. Smith, 216 La.
  • State v. Frost 727 So. 2d 417 La. 1998
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), mandate conformed to, , ("Voir dire examination is designed to test the competence and impartiality of prospective jurors and may not serve to pry into their opinions concerning evidence to be offered at trial.").
  • State v. Stewart 465 So. 2d 206 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), , (1972).
  • State v. Alexander 351 So. 2d 505 La. 1977
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 (1972), compliance with the mandate, , (1972).
  • State v. Bell 315 So. 2d 307 La. 1975
    2871 , 33 L.Ed.2d 760 , conformed to, , ; State v. Washington, 256 La.
  • State v. Preece 270 So. 2d 850 La. 1972
    294 , ; , ; State v. Sinclair, 263 La.