DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Walker v. Jones, 242 So. 2d 559.

15 citing documents.

  • Hernandez v. Excel Contractors, Inc. 275 So. 3d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    4/3/02), , 340 ( , (1970) ).
  • James v. Formosa Plastics Corp. of La. 813 So. 2d 335 La. 2002
  • Tolliver v. Crawford 621 So. 2d 879 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    That is to say, the trial court is divested of jurisdiction in the case only insofar as the parties and issues which are subject of the judgment appealed from.” , -63 (La.1971) (emphasis in original).
  • Plaquemines Parish Government v. State Mineral Board 615 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Jeansonne v. Bosworth 601 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Valet v. City of Hammond 577 So. 2d 155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
  • Brown v. Brown 550 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    (1970), it was held that a supplemental judgment may be signed where the trial judge has decided in favor of a party in an incidental demand but, through inadvertence or error, did not dispose of that demand in the signed original judgment.
  • Aries Marine Corp. v. Blue Streak Marine, Inc. 541 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    Art. 1915, Official Revision Comments, Comment (b); , (1970).
  • Moore v. South Central Bell Telephone Co. 488 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    (1970), the Louisiana Supreme Court recognized a partial final judgment not directly fitting into a category listed under this procedural article.
  • Cloud v. Huffman Motor Co., Inc. 416 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
    " , (1970) it was held that the trial court was not divested of jurisdiction over a third party action when that action had not been adjudicated and was not reviewable on appeal.
  • Chatelain v. Payzant 382 So. 2d 941 La. 1980
    (1970) it was held that the trial court was not divested of jurisdiction over a third party action when that action had not been adjudicated and was not reviewable on appeal.
  • Lee v. Lee 375 So. 2d 769 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
    (1970), a decision calculated to correct an injustice resulting from inadvertent omission of one claim from a final judgment which adjudicated all other claims, the courts have treated the situation enumerated in C.C.P.
  • Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. 365 So. 2d 586 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
  • Garvin v. City of New Orleans 270 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    1st Cir. 1970), affirmed , (1970), wherein the general rule was recognized but an exception made because the principal and incidental demands of different parties were at issue.
  • Williams v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co. 266 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    3rd Cir., 1970); , (1970).