DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company, 243 So. 2d 259.

32 citing documents.

  • Marcel v. DELTA SHIPBUILDING CO. 45 So. 3d 634 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2010
    Co., , (parental immunity), and Musmeci v. American Auto.
  • Nalle v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 702 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    See, , (1971)(parent permitted to recover damages from insurer, notwithstanding that tortfeasor was a son), and La.Civ.Code art. 2320 only assesses some degree of fault upon those in a position of supervision, care or guardianship who, unlike Ms. Nalle, "might have prevented the act which caused the damage an
  • Arthur v. Zapata Haynie Corp. 690 So. 2d 86 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
    857 , (1943); father-son immunity, , (1971); governmental immunity, Snell v. Stein, 261 La.
  • Pitcher on Behalf of Pitcher v. Pitcher 607 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
  • Matthews v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. 550 So. 2d 936 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • LeBlanc v. Phillips 546 So. 2d 1339 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    3rd Cir.1970), affirmed [ ] (La.App.
  • Van Pelt v. Morgan City Power Boat Ass'n, Inc. 489 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • Mayfield v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange 442 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
  • Audubon Insurance Co. v. Fuller 430 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    3rd Cir.1970), affirmed (La.
  • Fox v. Commercial Union Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
  • McIntyre v. Government Emp. Ins. Co. 413 So. 2d 174 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
  • West v. Jones 411 So. 2d 532 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Distinguished Gray v. Margot Inc. 408 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
  • Kern v. Travelers Ins. Co. 407 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
  • Liedtke v. Allstate Ins. Co. 405 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Whether the Town of Many and its insurer waived any pleas or defenses of contributory negligence as to Harry Liedtke's claim for medical expenses through assertions made in brief or oral argument to the effect that a
  • Knotts v. State, Dept. of Highways 395 So. 2d 419 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, 252 La.
  • Danzy v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 380 So. 2d 1356 La. 1980
    857 , (1943); father-son immunity, , (1971); governmental immunity, Snell v. Stein, 261 La.
  • Distinguished Gaudet v. GDC, INC. 383 So. 2d 1289 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
    (1971), relied upon by appellant, is distinguishable.
  • Flannigan v. Valliant 371 So. 2d 349 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
  • Deshotel v. Casualty Reciprocal Exch. 350 So. 2d 283 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Crandall v. Scott 350 So. 2d 922 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
  • Guillot v. Travelers Indem. Co. 338 So. 2d 334 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
  • Gremillion v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 302 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    (1971), the Louisiana Supreme Court again stated that the husband's defense of no right of action against suit by his wife is personal to the husband and not available to his insurer.
  • Traders & General Insurance Company v. Robison 289 So. 2d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Scott v. Behrman, La.App., .
  • Jagers v. Royal Indemnity Company 276 So. 2d 309 La. 1973
    (1971), in which we held that a father could bring an action against the liability insurer of his minor son, the Court of Appeal found that there was no prohibition in Louisiana that would prevent an action by this plaintiff against her adult son for damages arising out of an accident which occurred wh
  • Wooten v. Wimberly 272 So. 2d 303 La. 1973
    *307 , (1971), the status of the father is "vicarious, secondary and derivative"; his liability is, in reality, an absolute liability imposed by statute—a liability without fault.
  • Scott v. Behrman 273 So. 2d 661 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
  • Walker v. Milton 268 So. 2d 654 La. 1972
    243 So.2d *562 259 (1971), we held that a father injured through his son’s negligence could maintain -a direct action against the responsible insurer despite the parent-child immunity created by LSA-R.S.
  • Walker v. Milton 268 So. 2d 654 La. 1972
    (1971), we held that a father injured through his son's negligence could maintain a direct action against the responsible insurer despite the parent-child immunity created by LSA-R.S.
  • Jagers v. Royal Indemnity Company 257 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    (1971), our Supreme Court held that where a father sued his unemancipated minor son when involved in a car wreck in Louisiana where the son was driving, the father had a direct action against his own insurer (LSA-R.S.
  • Wooten v. Wimberly 254 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Again, referring to Art. 2318, , , said: “ * * * Article 2318 does not create negligence in the father because of the minor’s negligent acts; it merely attaches financial responsibility to the father for the delicts of his minor child.” The above expressions by our Supreme Court leave no doubt that the father’s liability under the afo
  • Bennett v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. 243 So. 2d 262 La. 1971
    For the reasons assigned in Deshotel v. Travelers Indemnity Company, this day decided, , , the judgment of the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, which reversed the trial court’s judgment sustaining the exceptions is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings.