Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, 245 So. 2d 151.

446 citing documents.

STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO. v. McCadney 806 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
Co., , (1971); Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp., 95-1863 (La.11/25/96), .
Metro Riverboat Associates, Inc. v. Louisiana Gaming Control Bd. 797 So. 2d 656 La. 2001
Co., , (1971); Board of Comm'rs for Atchafalaya Basin Levee Dist.
Daspit v. Barber 786 So. 2d 962 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2001
Doerr v. Mobil Oil Corp. 782 So. 2d 573 La. 2001
Co., , (1971) (collecting authorities).
Joseph v. Broussard Rice Mill, Inc. 772 So. 2d 94 La. 2000
Co., , (1971); see also ODECO Oil & (La.App.
Coleman v. Lewis 757 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
LeBlanc v. Stevenson 756 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2000
Furthermore, the full indemnification to which an injured party is entitled under Article *365 2315 ( , (1971)) includes damages for decreased earning capacity which is determined by deducting plaintiff's earning ability after the injury from his earning ability immediately prior to the injury rather than by deducting his income prior to the injury.
Cole v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Cole v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 755 So. 2d 315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
Smith v. Toys" R" US, Inc. 754 So. 2d 209 La. 1999
Winston v. Flamingo Casino 746 So. 2d 622 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. Berthelot 732 So. 2d 1230 La. 1999
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Berthelot 732 So. 2d 1230 La. 1999
McGinnis v. Piccadilly Cafeteria, Inc. 732 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
(1971), that the plaintiffs own reasonable testimony, if accepted as true, is sufficient to establish loss of income but that it is the better practice to introduce corroborating evidence.
Cash v. McGregor 730 So. 2d 497 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
Bowens v. Patterson 716 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
White v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 713 So. 2d 618 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1998
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Berthelot 709 So. 2d 1053 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
“One injured through the fault of another is entitled to full indemnification for the damages caused thereby.” , (1971).
O'RILEY v. City of Shreveport 706 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
Burnaman v. Risk Management, Inc. 698 So. 2d 17 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
(1971); Cushman v. Fireman's Fund Ins.
Dauzat v. Canal Ins. Co. 692 So. 2d 739 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
(1971); See Prosser, Torts, Sec.
Sonnier v. Bayou State Mobile Homes, Inc. 692 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1997
Todd v. State 685 So. 2d 313 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1997
Harvey v. Traylor 688 So. 2d 1324 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1997
Warren v. Campagna 686 So. 2d 969 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
Todd v. State ex rel. Department of Social Services, Office of Community Services 685 So. 2d 310 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Degruise v. Houma Courier Newspaper Corp. 683 So. 2d 689 La. 1996
Pierce v. Milford 688 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
The supreme court reinstated the jury award, notwithstanding an absence of historical evidence, because plaintiff was entitled to “full indemnification” under La.Civ.Code art. 2315: *1096 But the full indemnification to which an injured party is entitled under Article 2815 ( , (1971)) includes damages for decreased earning capacity which is determined by deducting plaintiffs earning ability after the injury from his earning ability immediately prior to the injury rather than by deducting his inc
Pierce v. Milford 688 So. 2d 1093 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
The supreme court reinstated the jury award, notwithstanding an absence of historical evidence, because plaintiff was entitled to "full indemnification" under La.Civ.Code art. 2315: *1096 But the full indemnification to which an injured party is entitled under Article 2315 ( , (1971)) includes damages for decreased earning capacity which is determined by deducting plaintiff's earning ability after the injury from his earning ability immediately prior to the injury rather than by deducting his in
Ducote v. City of Alexandria 670 So. 2d 1378 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Co., , (1971); Guillory v. Terra International, Inc., (La.App.
Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc. 664 So. 2d 1191 La. 1995
Co., , (1971); Williams v. City of Baton Rouge, 252 La.
Bourque v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 664 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Palomo v. LeBlanc Hyundai Partnership 665 So. 2d 414 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1995
Johnson v. State 671 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Donaldson v. Sanders 661 So. 2d 1010 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Pitre v. Louisiana Tech University 655 So. 2d 659 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
(1971); Harig v. State Through the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, 25,702 (La.App.
Istre v. Bratton 653 So. 2d 1205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Hebert v. Hebert 650 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Co., , (1971) and other authority.
Bush v. Arrow International 646 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
Alleman v. Brownie Drilling Co. 647 So. 2d 371 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Co., (tort victim diagnosed permanently disabled by treating physician due to tort-caused condition entitled to lost future earnings, although lost earnings shown only by lay testimony).
Fitch v. Vintage Petroleum, Inc. 652 So. 2d 998 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
995, (1971)) includes damages for decreased earning capacity which is determined by deducting plaintiff's earning ability after the injury from his earning ability immediately prior to the injury rather than by deducting his income after the injury from his income prior to the injury.
McCann v. ABC Ins. Co. 640 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
Co. [ ], 245 So.2d [151] at 155 [(1971)]: See Prosser, Torts, § 41, p. 269 (5th ed. 1984) ("Where the conclusion is not one within common knowledge, expert testimony may provide a sufficient basis for it, but in the absence of such testimony it may not be drawn.
Mayo v. Nissan Motor Corp. 639 So. 2d 773 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Ryals v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 636 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
A claim for lost future wages, as any other claim, need only be shown by a preponderance of the evidence, , (1971).
Harig v. State, Bd. of Elementary & Secondary Educ. 635 So. 2d 485 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
Fletcher v. Langley 631 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1994
Rick v. STATE, DOTD 630 So. 2d 1271 La. 1994
Cay v. STATE, DOTD 631 So. 2d 393 La. 1994
Sinor v. National Cas. Co. 633 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Hackman v. Southern Farm Bureau Ins. Co. 629 So. 2d 531 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993