Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, 245 So. 2d 151.

446 citing documents.

Teague v. Barnes 519 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
Williams v. Industrial Helicopters, Inc. 519 So. 2d 1180 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
Sanders v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 516 So. 2d 1162 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Parker v. Day 516 So. 2d 1211 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
McGrew v. Jordan 516 So. 2d 1246 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Tide Craft, Inc. v. Red Ball Oxygen Co. 514 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Roger v. Estate of Moulton 513 So. 2d 1126 La. 1987
Jordan v. Travelers Insurance, Inc., , (1971).
Partner v. Anderson 513 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
Andrews v. Mosley Well Service 514 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
Alexander v. LaGrange 509 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Jefferson v. Antee 502 So. 2d 148 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
Naquin v. Marquette Casualty Company, 244 La.
Whitacre v. Halo Optical Products, Inc. 501 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
South Cent. Bell Telephone Co. v. Gaines Petroleum Co., Inc. 499 So. 2d 521 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Thompson v. Simmons 499 So. 2d 517 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Cedotal v. Wausau Ins. Co. 497 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Gorbach v. Buck Kreihs Company, Inc., (La.App.
In Re Beychok 495 So. 2d 1278 La. 1986
Harrigan v. Freeman 498 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Schouest v. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc., , (1971).
Norris v. Bell Helicopter Textron 495 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Co., , (1971); Naquin v. Marquette Cas.
Bonner v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc. 494 So. 2d 1363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Miller v. Frank Ebarb, Inc. 492 So. 2d 1276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Upton v. L.O.B. Enterprises 492 So. 2d 1252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Theriot v. Bonnett 491 So. 2d 706 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Chance v. Stevens of Leesville, Inc. 491 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
"* * * proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not."
Boudreaux v. Murray 489 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
In this connection, we note the following jurisprudence: But the full indemnification to which an injured party is entitled under Article *952 2315 ( , (1971)) includes damages for decreased earning capacity which is determined by deducting plaintiff's earning ability after the injury from his earning ability immediately prior to the injury rather than by deducting his income after the injury from his income prior to the injury.
Ortigo v. Merritt 488 So. 2d 1051 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Thompson v. Tuggle 486 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Co., 257 La.995, (1971) ; Naquin v. Marquette Cas.
Taylor v. Dupree 484 So. 2d 986 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Joseph v. Bohn Ford, Inc. 483 So. 2d 934 La. 1986
(1971); Naquin v. *941 Marquette Casualty Company, 244 La.
Alleman v. Hanks Pontiac-GMC, Inc. 483 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Combs v. Howard 481 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
The Supreme Court, , (La.
Haggerty v. March 480 So. 2d 1064 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
Pringle v. Williamson Chevrolet, Buick & Pontiac, Inc. 480 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Bush v. Lafayette Ins. Co. 477 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Cross v. Hingle 475 So. 2d 1384 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
(5th Cir.1984); , (1971).
Austin's of Monroe, Inc. v. Brown 474 So. 2d 1383 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Mushatt v. Barouise 474 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
This may even consist only of plaintiff’s own reasonable testimony, if accepted as truthful...” , (1971).
McCurry v. City of New Orleans 475 So. 2d 2 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Simon v. Smith 470 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3rd Cir. 1962), , (1971).
Moses v. Ed's Manufactured Housing, Inc. 470 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
‘ * * * proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.’ “If the defect appears within three days following the sale, it is presumed
Kincade v. Doll 472 So. 2d 60 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Fusilier v. Northbrook Excess & Surplus Ins. Co. 471 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Derouselle v. Konecny 468 So. 2d 1382 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
However, , (1971), the Supreme Court held a claim for loss of earnings may be proved solely by the plaintiff's testimony, if it is found credible by the trial court, although the better practice is to introduce corroborating testimony.
Dubois v. State Through Dept. of Pub. Safety 466 So. 2d 1381 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Andries v. Moore 467 So. 2d 1312 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
3rd Cir.1982); , and authorities cited therein.
Lemon v. Fein 467 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
(1971) is most applicable in this case.
Petroleum Fluids Consultants, Inc. v. Dresser Industries, Inc. 463 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
3rd Cir. 1983), writ denied, ; , (1971).
TR Drilling Co., Inc. v. Howard 463 So. 2d 923 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
Watkins v. Kerr-McGee Oil Industries, Inc. 460 So. 2d 763 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Landaiche v. Lou-Con 461 So. 2d 1107 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
First Homestead Federal Savings v. Dent 459 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Co., , Cutrer v. Kentwood Motors, Inc., (La.App.