Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jordan v. Travelers Insurance Company, 245 So. 2d 151.

446 citing documents.

Davis v. Bowman 346 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
Kammer v. Bressler 343 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Coco v. Winston Industries, Inc. 341 So. 2d 332 La. 1977
But the full indemnification to which an injured party is entitled under Article 2315 ( , (1971)) includes damages for decreased earning capacity which is determined by deducting plaintiff's earning ability after the injury from his earning ability immediately prior to the injury rather than by deducting his income after the injury from his income prior to the injury.
Bracey v. Alexandria Transfer & Storage Co. 340 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
(1971); Hebert v. Your Food Processing & Warehouse, Inc., 248 La.
Distefano v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. 340 So. 2d 1110 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
(1971); Reeves v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co., (La.App.
Prestenbach v. Sentry Ins. Co. 340 So. 2d 1331 La. 1976
A & M Pest Control Serv., Inc. v. FEJTA CONST. CO. INC. 338 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
137 , (1964); , (1971); Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company, 262 La.
Guilbeau v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. 338 So. 2d 600 La. 1976
of 1974, Article 5, Section 5(F); , (1971).
Ritter v. Leigh & Wiggins, Inc. 337 So. 2d 281 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Austin v. Otis Elevator Company 336 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Jackson v. Pierre 336 So. 2d 261 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Oil Purchasers, Inc. v. Kuehling 334 So. 2d 420 La. 1976
Marshall v. Marshall-Koehl, Inc. 333 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Chism v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation 332 So. 2d 784 La. 1976
Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co., La., (1973); , (1971).
Chivoletto v. Johns-Manville Products Corp. 330 So. 2d 295 La. 1976
North American Contracting Corp. v. Gibson 327 So. 2d 444 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
(1971) and cases cited therein.
Burley v. Louisiana Power & Light Company 327 So. 2d 585 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Sahuque Rlty. Co. v. Employers Com'l U. Ins. Co. of Am. 327 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Overturf v. Bernard 331 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Even though it is not clear which expenses were for each problem, the plaintiff is, nevertheless, entitled to recovery, So.2d 151 (1971): “Where there is a legal right to recovery but the damages cannot be exactly estimated, the courts have reasonable discretion to assess same based upon all the facts and circumstances of the case.
Mitchell v. Equitable Equipment Company 330 So. 2d 919 La. 1976
1st Cir. 1970), affirmed (on this issue, but without discussion of it) , (1971); (La.App.
Loetzerich v. Texas Pacific-Missouri Pac. TR of NO 325 So. 2d 626 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 326 So. 2d 486 La. 1976
Coleman v. Victor 326 So. 2d 344 La. 1976
Breaux v. State 326 So. 2d 481 La. 1976
Melancon v. A & M Pest Control Service Co. 325 So. 2d 391 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Jordan v. Travelers Ins, Co., La., (1971).
Wilson v. Swinford 324 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Casadaban v. Bel Chemical & Supply Co., Inc. 322 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
While the absence of independent, corroborating evidence may not be fatal to the plaintiff's burden of proof, the lack of even a minimal degree of detail or specificity in his own testimony as to the extent of the loss precludes an award, , (1971), relative to the degree of certainty required to support an award of monetary damages.
White v. Freeport Chemical Company 319 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
[2] (S.Ct.1974); , ; Helbert v. Your Food Processing & Warehouse, Inc., 248 La.
Maguire v. Masino 325 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Townsend v. State, Department of Highways 322 So. 2d 139 La. 1975
(1971); Perkins v. Texas & New Orleans Railroad Company, 243 La.
Followed Brouillette v. National Remodelers & Rebuilders, Inc. 321 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Co., , (1971) which says: “Where there is a legal right to recovery but the damages cannot be exactly estimated, the courts have reasonable discretion to assess same based upon all the facts and circumstances of the case.” (La.App.1
Leleux v. Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance Company 318 So. 2d 15 La. 1975
(1971); Hebert v. Your Food Processing & Warehouse, Inc., 248 La.
Moreno's, Inc. v. LAKE CHARLES CATHOLIC HIGH SCHS., INC. 315 So. 2d 660 La. 1975
(1971) and cases cited there.
Glover v. Poydras 314 So. 2d 417 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Article 1934(3); , -155 (1971)
Mundel v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 312 So. 2d 692 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Article 1934(3); , (1971).
Gonzales v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc. 309 So. 2d 697 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
Co., , (1971); Boudreaux v. American Ins.
Kay v. Home Indemnity Company 313 So. 2d 303 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Gorbach v. Prager, Inc. 310 So. 2d 604 La. 1975
(1971); Hebert v. Your Food Processing & Warehouse, Inc., 248 La.
Rimmer & Garrett, Inc. v. Donnell & Fussell 306 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
(1971), cited by Donnell & Fussell, does not require a contrary result because in the instant case it is not reasonably certain that profits in any amount were lost.
Roniger v. Borden, Inc. 309 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Margiotta v. Trachtman 310 So. 2d 151 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Ticheli v. Silmon 304 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
`* * * proof by direct or circumstantial evidence is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when, taking the evidence as a whole, such proof shows the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.'
Menville v. Stephens Chevrolet, Inc. 300 So. 2d 858 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Co., , (1971) that proof is sufficient to constitute a preponderance when the evidence, taken as a whole, shows that the fact or causation sought to be proved is more probable than not.
Temento v. Verdoodt 303 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Co., 1971, , (see also Fox, supra), and some loss of earnings (despite an overall income increase in the year of disability).
Chaplain v. Kinsella 302 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Loicano v. Maryland Casualty Insurance Co. 301 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Hall v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc. 297 So. 2d 527 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Gradney v. Vancouver Plywood Co., Inc. 299 So. 2d 347 La. 1974
(1971); Hebert v. Your Food Processing & Warehouse, Inc., 248 La.
Prim v. City of Shreveport 297 So. 2d 421 La. 1974
(1971); Hebert v. Your Food Processing & Warehouse, Inc., 248 La.
Vicknair v. SOUTHERN FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSU. C. 292 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974