Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Poche v. Frazier, 236 So. 2d 36.
- Billiot v. Estate of Richardson 655 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
-
Carmen v. Gonzalez
637 So. 2d 1108
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
4 Cir. 1970), application denied, , (1970).
-
Davis v. Kreutzer
633 So. 2d 796
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
application denied, , (1970).
-
McKenzie v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation
621 So. 2d 6
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970).
-
In Re Medical Review Panel Bilello
621 So. 2d 6
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970).
-
Durkee v. City of Shreveport
587 So. 2d 722
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
4th Cir.), writ denied , (1970).
-
Holliday v. United Services Auto. Ass'n
569 So. 2d 143
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
4th Cir.), writ denied, , (1970), "[t]his court cannot pull a figure out of the air and award it as damages for future medical expenses, the occurrence of which is but a speculative possibility."
-
Hargroder v. Protective Life Ins. Co.
556 So. 2d 991
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
4th Cir.), writ denied, , (1970).
-
Dowe v. Grady
540 So. 2d 1040
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
4th Cir.1970), writ denied , (1970).
-
Highlands Ins. Co. v. Missouri Pacific RR Co.
532 So. 2d 317
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970).
-
McGraw v. Orleans Parish School Bd.
519 So. 2d 847
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
App. 4th Cir.1970), writ denied , (1970).
-
Simon v. Smith
470 So. 2d 941
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970); Head v. St.
-
Boothe v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.
447 So. 2d 620
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
4th Cir.), writ denied , (1970), states that: "Medical expenses, in order to be recoverable must be proved and awards will not be made for future medical expenses which may or may not occur in the absence of medical testimony that they are indicated and setting out their probable cost ...
-
Wilson v. Allstate Ins. Co.
446 So. 2d 786
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
4th Cir.), writ denied , (1970), stated that: "The law is also settled on the principle that when innocent third parties are injured as the result of the collision between two drivers, each of the drivers is deemed guilty of negligence, per se, and the burden of proof falls upon each to exculpate himself to negligence proximate
-
Veals v. Manis
437 So. 2d 359
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
4th Cir. 1970), writ denied , (1970), which holds that, where an innocent third party is injured in an automobile accident, there is a presumption of negligence on the part of the drivers and each has the burden of exculpating himself from negligence.
-
Spears v. Aguilar
436 So. 2d 672
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970); (La.App.
-
Holmes v. Christopher
435 So. 2d 1022
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , to hold her liable.
-
Ainsworth v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co.
399 So. 2d 1242
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
4th Cir. 1970), writ denied, , .
-
Jennings v. City of Alexandria
394 So. 2d 718
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
4th Cir. 1970), writs refused, , ; (La.
-
Edwards v. Lewis Grocery Co.
391 So. 2d 13
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
4th Cir. 1970), writ denied , ; (La.App.
-
Rawls v. Damare
377 So. 2d 1376
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
4th Cir. 1970), writs denied, , ; Producing Man.
-
Smith v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Rhode Island
374 So. 2d 708
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
4th Cir.1970) writ denied , (1970) our brethren on the Fourth Circuit stated: "[W]hen an innocent third party is injured as a result of a collision between two drivers, each of the drivers is deemed guilty of negligence per se and the burden of proof falls upon each to exculpate himself from negligence proximately causing the inju
-
Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co.
369 So. 2d 1120
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
4 Cir. 1970), writ denied, , (1970); (La.App.
-
Harts v. Pizzalato
245 So. 2d 740
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
4 Cir. 1970), writs refused , : "Our law is well settled that when an innocent third party is injured as a result of a collision between two drivers, each of the drivers is deemed guilty of negligence per se 1 and the burden of proof falls upon each to exculpate himself from negligence proximately causing the injury to the third par