Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Poche v. Frazier, 236 So. 2d 36.

24 citing documents.

  • Billiot v. Estate of Richardson 655 So. 2d 443 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Carmen v. Gonzalez 637 So. 2d 1108 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    4 Cir. 1970), application denied, , (1970).
  • Davis v. Kreutzer 633 So. 2d 796 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1994
    application denied, , (1970).
  • McKenzie v. Alton Ochsner Medical Foundation 621 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970).
  • In Re Medical Review Panel Bilello 621 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
    4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970).
  • Durkee v. City of Shreveport 587 So. 2d 722 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    4th Cir.), writ denied , (1970).
  • Holliday v. United Services Auto. Ass'n 569 So. 2d 143 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
    4th Cir.), writ denied, , (1970), "[t]his court cannot pull a figure out of the air and award it as damages for future medical expenses, the occurrence of which is but a speculative possibility."
  • Hargroder v. Protective Life Ins. Co. 556 So. 2d 991 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    4th Cir.), writ denied, , (1970).
  • Dowe v. Grady 540 So. 2d 1040 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    4th Cir.1970), writ denied , (1970).
  • Highlands Ins. Co. v. Missouri Pacific RR Co. 532 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970).
  • McGraw v. Orleans Parish School Bd. 519 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    App. 4th Cir.1970), writ denied , (1970).
  • Simon v. Smith 470 So. 2d 941 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970); Head v. St.
  • Boothe v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc. 447 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    4th Cir.), writ denied , (1970), states that: "Medical expenses, in order to be recoverable must be proved and awards will not be made for future medical expenses which may or may not occur in the absence of medical testimony that they are indicated and setting out their probable cost ...
  • Wilson v. Allstate Ins. Co. 446 So. 2d 786 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
    4th Cir.), writ denied , (1970), stated that: "The law is also settled on the principle that when innocent third parties are injured as the result of the collision between two drivers, each of the drivers is deemed guilty of negligence, per se, and the burden of proof falls upon each to exculpate himself to negligence proximate
  • Veals v. Manis 437 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
    4th Cir. 1970), writ denied , (1970), which holds that, where an innocent third party is injured in an automobile accident, there is a presumption of negligence on the part of the drivers and each has the burden of exculpating himself from negligence.
  • Spears v. Aguilar 436 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , (1970); (La.App.
  • Holmes v. Christopher 435 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    4th Cir.1970), writ denied, , to hold her liable.
  • Ainsworth v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. 399 So. 2d 1242 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    4th Cir. 1970), writ denied, , .
  • Jennings v. City of Alexandria 394 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    4th Cir. 1970), writs refused, , ; (La.
  • Edwards v. Lewis Grocery Co. 391 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
    4th Cir. 1970), writ denied , ; (La.App.
  • Rawls v. Damare 377 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    4th Cir. 1970), writs denied, , ; Producing Man.
  • Smith v. Travelers Indem. Co. of Rhode Island 374 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    4th Cir.1970) writ denied , (1970) our brethren on the Fourth Circuit stated: "[W]hen an innocent third party is injured as a result of a collision between two drivers, each of the drivers is deemed guilty of negligence per se and the burden of proof falls upon each to exculpate himself from negligence proximately causing the inju
  • Parker v. Travelers Ins. Co. 369 So. 2d 1120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    4 Cir. 1970), writ denied, , (1970); (La.App.
  • Harts v. Pizzalato 245 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    4 Cir. 1970), writs refused , : "Our law is well settled that when an innocent third party is injured as a result of a collision between two drivers, each of the drivers is deemed guilty of negligence per se 1 and the burden of proof falls upon each to exculpate himself from negligence proximately causing the injury to the third par