Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 245 So. 2d 327.

94 citing documents.

State v. Hall 524 So. 2d 179 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
State v. Trahan, supra ; State v. Johnson, supra ; , (1971); or in joint possession of a drug which is in the physical possession of a companion, if he willfully and knowingly shares with the other the right to control the drug.
State v. Kingsmill 514 So. 2d 599 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Trahan, supra ; State v. Johnson, supra ; , (La.
State v. Walker 514 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Trahan, supra ; State v. Johnson, supra ; , (1971); or if the person is in joint possession of a drug which is in the physical possession of a companion, if he willfully and knowingly shares with the other the right to control of the drug.
State v. Hernandez 513 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
State v. Broadnax 503 So. 2d 511 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Oliver 499 So. 2d 295 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
(1971), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
State v. Maresco 495 So. 2d 311 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
State v. Collins 495 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
State v. Guillot 470 So. 2d 360 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
art. 774 (1966); , (1971).
State v. Viera 449 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
State v. Tasker 448 So. 2d 1311 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Jackson 439 So. 2d 616 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Allen 431 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
(1971), the court held that "a person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control."
State v. Trahan 425 So. 2d 1222 La. 1983
State v. Beals 410 So. 2d 745 La. 1982
1978); , (1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State ex rel. Michel 411 So. 2d 528 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
State v. Marks, supra; , (1971).
State v. Goiner 410 So. 2d 1085 La. 1982
896 , (1971); , (1971); State v. Kreller, 255 La.
State v. Toomer 395 So. 2d 1320 La. 1981
art. 774 (1966); , (1971).
State v. Gould 395 So. 2d 647 La. 1981
State v. Clark 387 So. 2d 1124 La. 1980
State v. Fisher 380 So. 2d 1340 La. 1980
(1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Chopin 372 So. 2d 1222 La. 1979
(1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Hatfield 364 So. 2d 578 La. 1978
1978); , (1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Schmidt 359 So. 2d 133 La. 1978
(1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Stewart 357 So. 2d 1111 La. 1978
(1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Dunbar 356 So. 2d 956 La. 1978
(1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. Shivers 346 So. 2d 657 La. 1977
(1971); State v. Andrus, 250 La.
State v. De La Beckwith 344 So. 2d 360 La. 1977
art. 774 (1966); , (1971).
State v. Perique 340 So. 2d 1369 La. 1976
(1971) that one need not actually possess the controlled dangerous substance to violate the prohibition thereof; constructive possession is sufficient.
State v. Marks 337 So. 2d 1177 La. 1976
(1971), that one need not actually possess the controlled dangerous substance to violate the prohibition thereof; constructive possession is sufficient.
State v. Mims 330 So. 2d 905 La. 1976
State v. Alford 323 So. 2d 788 La. 1975
(1971); "A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
State v. Roach 322 So. 2d 222 La. 1975
2d 726 (La.1974); , (1971).
State v. Cann 319 So. 2d 396 La. 1975
(1971), we held: "A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
State v. Weathers 320 So. 2d 895 La. 1975
art. 774 (1966); , (1971).
State v. Hamilton 297 So. 2d 419 La. 1974
State v. Knight 298 So. 2d 726 La. 1974
896 , (1971); , (1971); State v. Kreller, 255 La.
State v. Porter 296 So. 2d 302 La. 1974
896 , (1971); State v. Smith , (1971); State v. Kreller, 255 La.
State v. Stewart 292 So. 2d 677 La. 1974
State v. Pellerin 286 So. 2d 639 La. 1973
(1971); State v. Bischoff, 146 La.
State v. Clouatre 264 So. 2d 595 La. 1972
State v. Cazes 263 So. 2d 8 La. 1972
(1971) and cases cited therein.
State v. Dobard 263 So. 2d 16 La. 1972
Art. 27, Code of Criminal Procedure.” , (1971), we held: “A person may be in constructive possession of a drug even though it is not in his physical custody, if it is subject to his dominion and control.
State v. Andry 255 So. 2d 81 La. 1971