Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Grey, 245 So. 2d 178.

37 citing documents.

  • State v. Lee 559 So. 2d 1310 La. 1990
    only 24% blacks were represented on the jury venire whereas the parish population consisted of 60% blacks.
  • State v. Kimble 411 So. 2d 430 La. 1982
  • State v. Penson 351 So. 2d 1181 La. 1977
  • State v. Sheppard 350 So. 2d 615 La. 1977
  • State v. Anthony 347 So. 2d 483 La. 1977
    " , (1971), we held: 'The allegation that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence and the attack upon the credibility of the witnesses and their evidence present no question of law for our review.'" Assignments of Error Nos. 1, 8,10,11, 12, 13, 14, 20, 22, 23, 24, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44
  • State v. Johnson 315 So. 2d 636 La. 1975
    (1971), we held: “The allegation that the verdict is contrary to the law and the evidence and the attack upon the credibility of the witnesses and their evidence present no question of law for our review.” For the reasons assigned, the conviction and sentence are affirmed.
  • State v. Flood 301 So. 2d 637 La. 1974
  • State v. Arceneaux 302 So. 2d 1 La. 1974
  • State v. Laurent 290 So. 2d 809 La. 1974
  • State v. Pellerin 286 So. 2d 639 La. 1973
    701 , (1972); , (1971); State v. McClain, 254 La.
  • State v. Barnard 287 So. 2d 770 La. 1973
  • State v. Vincent 284 So. 2d 563 La. 1973
  • State v. Vassel 285 So. 2d 221 La. 1973
  • State v. Moseley 284 So. 2d 749 La. 1973
  • State v. Green 282 So. 2d 461 La. 1973
  • State v. Frezal 278 So. 2d 64 La. 1973
  • State v. Rideau 278 So. 2d 100 La. 1973
  • State v. Neal 275 So. 2d 765 La. 1973
  • State v. Holloway 274 So. 2d 699 La. 1973
  • State v. Williams 273 So. 2d 280 La. 1973
  • State v. Rose 271 So. 2d 863 La. 1973
  • State v. Ranker 269 So. 2d 812 La. 1972
  • State v. Evans 267 So. 2d 185 La. 1972
  • State v. Curry 264 So. 2d 583 La. 1972
  • State v. Crockett 263 So. 2d 6 La. 1972
    The allegation that the verdict is contrary to the law and evidence presents nothing more for review, , (1971), this bill has no merit.
  • State v. Curry 263 So. 2d 36 La. 1972
    (1971), we stated: “Counsel for defendants has established two facts basic for the contentions raised in this bill: About 60 per cent of the population of the parish are Negroes, and of the 325 persons whose names were on the general jury venire 24 per cent were Negroes.
  • State v. Causey 262 So. 2d 326 La. 1972
  • State v. Whitsell 262 So. 2d 509 La. 1972
  • State v. Williams 262 So. 2d 507 La. 1972
  • State v. Orsby 260 So. 2d 639 La. 1972
  • State v. Mathis 260 So. 2d 625 La. 1972
  • State v. Dillard 260 So. 2d 675 La. 1972
    By agreement, evidence taken in another case ( , ) about the composition of the same jury venires was introduced in the instant case.
  • State v. Lee 259 So. 2d 334 La. 1972
  • State v. Diggs 259 So. 2d 18 La. 1972
  • State v. Scott 256 So. 2d 432 La. 1972
  • State v. Biagas 255 So. 2d 77 La. 1971
    (1971); State v. Ponthieux, 254 La.
  • State v. Raby 253 So. 2d 370 La. 1971
    we said: “ * * * In the light of the witness’s earlier statement that the two Grey boys participated in the burglary with him, his testimony before the jury that they were not present clearly constituted surprise upon a material matter ‘against the party introducing him and in favor of the other side