Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Smith, 244 So. 2d 824.

19 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Kevin Robert Sterling La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2024
(1971) (internal citations omitted) (observing that “guilty knowledge is an essential ingredient of the crime of possession of narcotic drugs, i.e., the knowing and intentional possession of a drug subjecting the possessor to criminal liability”).
State v. Lockett 754 So. 2d 1128 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
651 , (1972), , (1971), and State v. Clack, 254 La.
State v. Harris 510 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
State v. Brown 479 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
1167 , (1972); , (1971).
State v. Goiner 410 So. 2d 1085 La. 1982
(1971); State v. Smith, 257 La.
State v. Edwards 354 So. 2d 1322 La. 1978
State v. Knight, La., (1974); State v. Porter, La., (1974); , (1971).
State v. Tassin 343 So. 2d 681 La. 1977
Under the "guilty knowledge" jurisprudence, see, , (1971), the state was entitled to introduce in its case in chief this evidence as to prior use, in order to prove the defendant's present knowing possession of an illegal drug.
State v. Perique 340 So. 2d 1369 La. 1976
1167 , (1972); , (1971).
State v. Thomas 329 So. 2d 704 La. 1976
State v. Mims 330 So. 2d 905 La. 1976
State v. Alford 323 So. 2d 788 La. 1975
1974); , (1971); State v. Kreller, 255 La.
State v. Humphreys 319 So. 2d 344 La. 1975
State v. Pierre 302 So. 2d 10 La. 1974
Since guilty knowledge is an essential element to prove illegal possession of heroin, , (1971), a serious issue was presented of whether the defendant knew the substance he possessed was heroin, as well as whether the defendant possessed for heroin-use the paraphernalia seized from him.
State v. Knight 298 So. 2d 726 La. 1974
(1971); State v. Smith, 257 La.
State v. Porter 296 So. 2d 302 La. 1974
(1971); State v. Smith 257 La.
State v. Kibby 294 So. 2d 196 La. 1974
State v. Tharp 284 So. 2d 536 La. 1973
40:970 provides, in pertinent part, that "* * * it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to produce, manufacture, distribute or dispense or possess with intent to produce, manufacture, distribute or dispense, a controlled dangerous substance * * *" Clearly, an essential element of the crime of distributing a controlled dangerous substance is guilty knowledge, , (1971), nevertheless, the trial judge has wide discretion in the discipline of his court to stop certain lines of
State v. Clouatre 264 So. 2d 595 La. 1972
State v. Williams 258 So. 2d 539 La. 1972