Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Haggerty, 241 So. 2d 469.

22 citing documents.

  • In Re Benge 24 So. 3d 822 La. 2009
    (1970) (internal citations omitted).
  • In Re Miller 949 So. 2d 379 La. 2007
    Compare , (1970) (judge removed because, in part, he associated with "purported underworld characters," procured pornographic material, struck a police officer, was involved in gambling activities, and resisted arrest); (judge removed for guilty plea in federal court to mis
  • In Re Krake 942 So. 2d 18 La. 2006
    See In re: Haggerty, , (1970).
  • In Re Doggett 874 So. 2d 805 La. 2004
    As we stated in , (1970): The office of judge is one in which the general public has a deep and vital interest, and, because that is true, the official conduct of judges, as well as their private *816 conduct, is closely observed.
  • Explained In Re Hughes 874 So. 2d 746 La. 2004
    While it is not illegal to associate with known criminals, in , (1970), a case in which a judge was found guilty of misconduct, in part for associating with a "purported underworld character," we explained that a judge's conduct in this regard "bring[s] disgrace and discredit upon his judicial office and a loss of public respect and confidence in his ability a
  • In Re McInnis 769 So. 2d 1186 La. 2000
    See In re Bowers, 98-1735, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), -81 ; In re Johnson, 96-1866, p. 15 (La.11/25/96), , 1202; , (1970).
  • In Re Jefferson 753 So. 2d 181 La. 2000
    The statements made in , (1970), are equally applicable here: In summary, perhaps none of the improprieties noted might be ground[s] for removal by itself.
  • In Re Bowers 721 So. 2d 875 La. 1998
    (holding that the Commission's combination of investigative and judicial functions does not violate due process); In re Whitaker, 463 So.2d at 1296 (noting that the Commission "need only provide the minimum standards of due process contained in the Supreme Court Rules and its own rules f
  • In Re Harris 713 So. 2d 1138 La. 1998
    In , a case involving a judge's association with purported underworld characters, we stated that the judge's conduct, "[brought] disgrace and discredit upon his judicial office and a loss of public respect and confidence in his ability and temperament to perform his duties."
  • In Re Quirk 705 So. 2d 172 La. 1997
  • In Re Johnson 683 So. 2d 1196 La. 1996
  • In Re Huckaby 656 So. 2d 292 La. 1995
    Compare , (1970), which epitomizes public misconduct.
  • In Re Chaisson 549 So. 2d 259 La. 1989
    See, e.g., In re Dupont, supra; , (1970) (removal warranted where private misconduct included involvment in gambling and pornography contrary to the criminal law).
  • In Re Whitaker 463 So. 2d 1291 La. 1985
  • OFFICE OF ENVIR. AFFAIRS v. McWHORTER & ASSOC. 449 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
  • State v. Johnson 432 So. 2d 815 La. 1983
    722 , 58 L.Ed.2d 706 (1978); -12 (La.1978); , (1970); State v. Kimberlin, 246 La.
  • State v. Reeves 427 So. 2d 403 La. 1983
  • In Re Wilkes 403 So. 2d 35 La. 1981
    State v. O'Hara, 252 La.
  • In Re Babineaux 346 So. 2d 676 La. 1977
  • In Re Daniels 340 So. 2d 301 La. 1976
  • In Re Dupont 322 So. 2d 180 La. 1975
    State v. O'Hara, supra; , (1970).
  • State v. Gulf States Theatres of Louisiana, Inc. 270 So. 2d 547 La. 1972
    Hard core pornography is such as that involved in , (1970), which explicitly depicted in detail sexual activity.