Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Haggerty, 241 So. 2d 469.
-
In Re Benge
24 So. 3d 822
La. 2009
(1970) (internal citations omitted).
-
In Re Miller
949 So. 2d 379
La. 2007
Compare , (1970) (judge removed because, in part, he associated with "purported underworld characters," procured pornographic material, struck a police officer, was involved in gambling activities, and resisted arrest); (judge removed for guilty plea in federal court to mis
-
In Re Krake
942 So. 2d 18
La. 2006
See In re: Haggerty, , (1970).
-
In Re Doggett
874 So. 2d 805
La. 2004
As we stated in , (1970): The office of judge is one in which the general public has a deep and vital interest, and, because that is true, the official conduct of judges, as well as their private *816 conduct, is closely observed.
-
Explained
In Re Hughes
874 So. 2d 746
La. 2004
While it is not illegal to associate with known criminals, in , (1970), a case in which a judge was found guilty of misconduct, in part for associating with a "purported underworld character," we explained that a judge's conduct in this regard "bring[s] disgrace and discredit upon his judicial office and a loss of public respect and confidence in his ability a
-
In Re McInnis
769 So. 2d 1186
La. 2000
See In re Bowers, 98-1735, p. 9 (La.12/1/98), -81 ; In re Johnson, 96-1866, p. 15 (La.11/25/96), , 1202; , (1970).
-
In Re Jefferson
753 So. 2d 181
La. 2000
The statements made in , (1970), are equally applicable here: In summary, perhaps none of the improprieties noted might be ground[s] for removal by itself.
-
In Re Bowers
721 So. 2d 875
La. 1998
(holding that the Commission's combination of investigative and judicial functions does not violate due process); In re Whitaker, 463 So.2d at 1296 (noting that the Commission "need only provide the minimum standards of due process contained in the Supreme Court Rules and its own rules f
-
In Re Harris
713 So. 2d 1138
La. 1998
In , a case involving a judge's association with purported underworld characters, we stated that the judge's conduct, "[brought] disgrace and discredit upon his judicial office and a loss of public respect and confidence in his ability and temperament to perform his duties."
- In Re Quirk 705 So. 2d 172 La. 1997
- In Re Johnson 683 So. 2d 1196 La. 1996
-
In Re Huckaby
656 So. 2d 292
La. 1995
Compare , (1970), which epitomizes public misconduct.
-
In Re Chaisson
549 So. 2d 259
La. 1989
See, e.g., In re Dupont, supra; , (1970) (removal warranted where private misconduct included involvment in gambling and pornography contrary to the criminal law).
- In Re Whitaker 463 So. 2d 1291 La. 1985
- OFFICE OF ENVIR. AFFAIRS v. McWHORTER & ASSOC. 449 So. 2d 1062 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
-
State v. Johnson
432 So. 2d 815
La. 1983
722 , 58 L.Ed.2d 706 (1978); -12 (La.1978); , (1970); State v. Kimberlin, 246 La.
- State v. Reeves 427 So. 2d 403 La. 1983
-
In Re Wilkes
403 So. 2d 35
La. 1981
State v. O'Hara, 252 La.
- In Re Babineaux 346 So. 2d 676 La. 1977
- In Re Daniels 340 So. 2d 301 La. 1976
-
In Re Dupont
322 So. 2d 180
La. 1975
State v. O'Hara, supra; , (1970).
-
State v. Gulf States Theatres of Louisiana, Inc.
270 So. 2d 547
La. 1972
Hard core pornography is such as that involved in , (1970), which explicitly depicted in detail sexual activity.