Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty Co., 247 So. 2d 572.

27 citing documents.

Louisiana Safety Ass'n of Timbermen-Self Insurers Fund v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty 17 So. 3d 350 La. 2009
Joseph v. Hospital Service District No. 2 of the Parish of St. Mary 939 So. 2d 1206 La. 2006
The court of appeal rejected the hospital’s , (1971), requiring a stipulation pour autrui to be in writing.
Joseph v. HOSPITAL SERVICE DISTRICT NO. 2 939 So. 2d 1206 La. 2006
(1971), requiring a stipulation pour autrui to be in writing.
Joseph v. Hospital Service District No. 2 of the Parish of St. Mary 923 So. 2d 27 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
We begin, not in the beginning, , (1971) is the point at which the rales became murky.
Daigle v. Vanderpool 858 So. 2d 552 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
The jurisprudential requirement of a , (1971)
Donaldson v. United Community Ins. Co. 741 So. 2d 676 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Co., , (1971) our Supreme Court addressed the concept of reinsurance for the first time.
Homer Nat. Bank v. Tri-District Dev. Corp. 534 So. 2d 154 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
347 , (1969); , (1971); Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana et al v. Louisiana State Employees' Retirement System, supra .
Spears v. McCormick & Co., Inc. 520 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
[9] , (1971): "In Louisiana contracts for the benefit of others, or the stipulation pour autrui, must be in writing and clearly express that intent."
First State Bank & Trust Co. v. SEVEN GABLES CO. 501 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
CAMELLIA PLACE SUBDIVISION-BLOCK 1 ASS'N v. Willet 491 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
Fontenot v. Marquette *768 Casualty Co., , (1971).
Emile M. Babst Co. v. Atlas Erection Co. 487 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Fontenot v. Marquette, supra [ , (1971)]; Teacher’s Ret.
Dartez v. Dixon 486 So. 2d 762 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
Wall v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport 482 So. 2d 865 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
Guillory v. Morein 468 So. 2d 1254 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Arrow Trucking Co. v. Continental Ins. Co. 465 So. 2d 691 La. 1985
Arrow Trucking Co. v. Continental Insurance Co. 452 So. 2d 217 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
State v. Cooper 449 So. 2d 1376 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
TEACHERS'RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. Louisiana State Emp. Ret. 444 So. 2d 193 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Mitchell v. Clark 448 So. 2d 681 La. 1984
Jackson v. Brumfield 442 So. 2d 518 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
1890, 1902; , (1971); (La.App.
Logan v. Hollier 424 So. 2d 1279 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
(1971), holding that neither contract of reinsurance nor the direct action state conferred rights in third party against the reinsurer; and Allen and Currey Manufacturing Co. v. Shreveport Waterworks Co., 113 La.
Berry v. Berry 371 So. 2d 1346 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
While it is likely that Berry, a licensed and practicing Louisiana attorney, knew [4] , (1971), that a stipulation pour autrui must be in writing, [5] we do not base our decision thereon.
Sears v. Parkchester Apartments, Inc. 338 So. 2d 753 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
(All-Star itself, if only a re-insurer, is not liable to plaintiffs in a direct action; Fontenot v. Marquette Casualty, 1971, , ).
Landesman v. Ford Motor Co. 331 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
However, contracts for the benefit of others, or the stipulation pour autri, must be in writing and clearly express that intent, , (1971).
Hargroder v. Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. 278 So. 2d 864 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Hertz Equip. Rent. Corp. v. Homer Knost Const. Co., Inc. 273 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
the Court said: "Courts should not and cannot by implication extend or restrict a contract to mean something different from that intended by the parties."
J. M. Brown Construction Co. v. D & M Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 258 So. 2d 594 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
which was an action by an injured plaintiff against the re-insurer of the tort-feasor’s insolvent liability insurer.