Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of NY, 250 So. 2d 754.

214 citing documents.

  • Antley v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USA 539 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    Co. of New York, , (1971).
  • 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney 538 So. 2d 228 La. 1989
    Co. of N.Y., , Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins.
  • Strain v. Mitchell Mfg. Co. 534 So. 2d 1385 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of New York, , (1971).
  • Hicks v. Cook 533 So. 2d 1321 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., , (1971).
  • Boubel v. Gilardi 532 So. 2d 948 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    See Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of New York, , (1971).
  • Friar v. Caterpillar, Inc. 529 So. 2d 509 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    82 , 74 L.Ed.2d 78 (1982), quoting Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, , -56 (1971).
  • Harris v. Wright Furniture of Gonzales 527 So. 2d 1063 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co., , (1971).
  • Prather v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., Inc. 526 So. 2d 1325 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Co. of New York, , (1971).
  • Briggs v. Hartford Ins. Co. 517 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., , (1971).
  • Hines v. Remington Arms Co., Inc. 522 So. 2d 152 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    (See: , [La.1971]; Landry v. E.A.
  • Gines v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. 516 So. 2d 1231 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    1987); Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., , (1971).
  • Williams v. American Crescent Elevator 518 So. 2d 1091 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • Trahan v. Gerber Food Products, Inc. 520 So. 2d 956 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Co. of N.Y., , (1971); Reeves v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., (La.App.
  • Felice v. Valleylab, Inc. 520 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • Safeco Ins. Co. v. Baker 515 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Co. of N.Y., , (1971)] supra; see, generally, Prosser & Keeton on Torts § 41; Twerski, Seizing the Middle Ground, 57 N.Y.
  • Tide Craft, Inc. v. Red Ball Oxygen Co. 514 So. 2d 664 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
  • Brown v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. 514 So. 2d 439 La. 1987
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., , (1971).
  • Bloxom v. Bloxom 512 So. 2d 839 La. 1987
  • Ingram v. Caterpillar Machinery Corp. 510 So. 2d 741 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., , (1971).
  • Howard v. Allstate Ins. Co. 510 So. 2d 685 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
    At the time Article 2323 was originally drafted, we had not yet recognized strict products liability, which was established in Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co., , (1971), and we had yet to develop the theories of relational responsibility strict liability.
  • Toups v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. 507 So. 2d 809 La. 1987
    Co. of New York, , (1971)."
  • Brown v. Sears Roebuck & Co. 503 So. 2d 1122 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    The Supreme Court then set forth the rule of strict liability for manufacturers of defective products as established in Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., , (1971).
  • Whittle v. MILLER ELECTRICAL MFG. CO. 507 So. 2d 266 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Co. of New York, , (1971).
  • LeBleu v. Homelite Div. of Textron, Inc. 509 So. 2d 563 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
    Co. of New York, , (1971)."
  • Whitacre v. Halo Optical Products, Inc. 501 So. 2d 994 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1987
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., , (1971).
  • Short v. Otis Elevator Co. 502 So. 2d 1100 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • Rowell v. Carter Mobile Homes, Inc. 500 So. 2d 748 La. 1987
    Co., , (1971), and the professional vendor or merchant is presumed to know of the vices in the things he sells, whether or not he had actual knowledge of them.
  • Bloxom v. Bloxom 494 So. 2d 1297 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company, , (1971); (La.
  • Harrigan v. Freeman 498 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of New York, , (1971).
  • Norris v. Bell Helicopter Textron 495 So. 2d 976 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    1981); Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of New York, , (1971); (La.
  • Carollo v. Newton 492 So. 2d 205 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • LaFleur v. John Deere Co. 491 So. 2d 624 La. 1986
    Co., , (1971), and Chappuis, supra is that here personal injury damages are not involved.
  • Tyler v. Natchitoches Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 491 So. 2d 358 La. 1986
  • Haspel v. Rollins Protective Service, Inc. 490 So. 2d 530 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Co. of N.Y., , (1971)), we find that the exculpatory clause would cover liability for a manufacturing or design defect.
  • Henley v. Sterling Drug, Inc. 489 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of New York, , (1971).
  • Thompson v. Tuggle 486 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    Co. of N.Y., 259 La.599, 608-09, (1971) ."
  • Joseph v. Bohn Ford, Inc. 483 So. 2d 934 La. 1986
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of New York, , (1971); Radalec, Incorporated v. Automatic Firing Corporation, 228 La.
  • Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. 484 So. 2d 110 La. 1986
    Co. of New York, , (1971).
  • Marshall v. Beno Truck Equipment, Inc. 481 So. 2d 1022 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    4th Cir.1982), writs denied, , ; Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., , (1971); (La.App.
  • Tyler v. Natchitoches Coca-Cola Bottling Co. 479 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    The Supreme Court applied the test set out in Weber v. Fidelty & Casualty Insurance Co., , (1971).
  • Scott v. Terrebonne Lumber Co. 479 So. 2d 410 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    -756 (1971) wherein the court stated: A manufacturer of a product which involves a risk of injury to the user is liable to any person, whether the purchaser *413 or a third person, who without fault on his part, sustains an injury caused by a defect in the design, composition, or manufacture of the
  • Jackson v. JI Case, Inc. 473 So. 2d 359 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1985
  • Lanclos v. Rockwell Intern. Corp. 470 So. 2d 924 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    3rd Cir.1983), writs denied, and ; Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of N.Y.
  • Gaudet v. G.D.C., Inc. 477 So. 2d 731 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    As was stated in Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of New York, , (1971), “a manufac *733 turer of a product which involves a risk of injury to the user is liable to any person, whether the purchaser or a third person, who without fault on his part, sustains an injury caused by a defect in the design, composition, or manufacture of the article, if the injury might re
  • Edwards v. City of Leesville 465 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co. of N.Y., , (1971).
  • Carroll v. Newtron, Inc. 477 So. 2d 719 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York, , at pages 755-756 (1971).
  • McCaskill v. Welch 463 So. 2d 942 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Co., , (1971).
  • Bell v. Jet Wheel Blast, Div. of Ervin Industries 462 So. 2d 166 La. 1985
    In Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of New York, , (1971) this court recognized a form of fault giving rise to a cause of action under Civil Code article 2315 based on strict products liability.
  • Miller v. Upjohn Co. 465 So. 2d 42 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of N.Y., , (1971).
  • Gatlin v. Coca-Cola Co. 461 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
    Robertson v. Gulf South Beverage, Inc., Weber v. Fidelity & Casualty Insurance Company of New York