50825, 50851 Precedential Processed

Chambers v. Chambers

Louisiana Supreme Court · Filed June 25, 1971 · 249 So. 2d 896

Cited by

Opinion text

TATE, J., dissents: From the observations of the distinguished author of the majority opinion, I do not believe that the “Per Curiam” denying this rehearing represents the view of a 'majority of this court. For this reason, as well as those set down in my original dissent, I respectfully enter this additional dissent from this “Per Curiam”.