DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dotson, 256 So. 2d 594.

164 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana Versus Eric Richardson La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2019
    4/24/98), -42; -600 (La.
  • State v. Handy 226 So. 3d 1182 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2017
    623 ; , 256 So.2d at, 606 (La.
  • State v. Lewis 188 So. 3d 1040 La. 2016
    State v. Coleman, 97-2802, pp. 3-4 (La.4/24/98), -442 ; , -600 (1971).
  • State v. Regis 25 So. 3d 183 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2009
  • State of Louisiana v. Larry J. Julian, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    So.2d 594, 606 6 (1971) (on rehearing), cert.
  • State v. Julian 25 So. 3d 253 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    (1971) (on rehearing), cert.
  • State v. Griffin 984 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2008
    See *115 -506 , (1971) (on rehearing), cert.
  • State v. Glosson 843 So. 2d 649 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2003
    State v. Robinson, supra; , cert.
  • State v. Henderson 721 So. 2d 85 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1998
  • State v. Zapata 713 So. 2d 1152 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1998
    (1971) (on rehearing), cert.
  • State v. Coleman 702 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1997
  • State v. Akins 687 So. 2d 489 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    (1971); State v. James, supra.
  • State v. Becnel 668 So. 2d 1281 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1996
    623, 627 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957); , (1971), cert.
  • State v. Thornton 671 So. 2d 481 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
    (1971) (on rehearing), cert.
  • State v. Gaines 636 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1994
    623, 627 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957); , cert.
  • State v. Carey 626 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
    623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957); , (1971), cert.
  • State v. Sumlin 617 So. 2d 225 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1993
  • State v. Deal 607 So. 2d 641 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
    623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957); , (1971), cert.
  • State v. Jones 587 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957); , (1971), cert.
  • McLaughlin v. Fireman's Fund Ins. Co. 582 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1991
    The defendants assert "the procedures followed and testimony offered with regard to the custody of the blood samples in this case were sufficient to support the admissibility of the blood tests at issue," , (1971); State v. Coleman, 254 La.
  • State v. Williams 575 So. 2d 452 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    art. 404(B)(1), they are permissible, if relevant, to show motive, opportunity, , at 601 (1971).
  • State v. Hall 549 So. 2d 373 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    State v. Sweeney, supra; , (1971), cert.
  • McLaughlin v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co. 549 So. 2d 327 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    1980: , (1971); State v. Coleman, 254 La.
  • State v. Bailey 545 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Simon 544 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • State v. Rogers 540 So. 2d 1155 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
    (1971) (on rehearing), cert.
  • State v. French 538 So. 2d 1117 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
  • State v. Issac 527 So. 2d 1045 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1988
    -609 (La.1971) (on rehearing), cert.
  • State v. Bryant 521 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • State v. Fontenot 524 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1988
    (1971); State v. James, supra.
  • State v. Badie 510 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
    (1971) that identity should be disclosed only when the informer, cooperating with the police, participated in the crime.
  • State v. Huber 504 So. 2d 644 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1987
  • State v. Ourso 502 So. 2d 246 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
  • State v. Troquille 493 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
    Thus, the present case must be examined in the light of the outlines laid down in the Roviaro case and subsequently followed by this State Supreme Court in the cases of State v. Dotson, [ , (1971)] State v. Santos, [ ] and State v. Williams, [ ] supra.
  • State v. Bell 488 So. 2d 1200 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
  • State v. Medford 489 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
  • State v. Pittman 486 So. 2d 895 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    State v. Dotson, 260 La.471, (1971), cert.
  • State v. Clouatre 482 So. 2d 106 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1986
    Oliver, supra; , (1971), cert.
  • State v. McGee 478 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Long 473 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
  • State v. Montegut 471 So. 2d 286 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
  • State v. Fournier 465 So. 2d 963 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Ultimately, connexity of physical evidence is a factual matter for determination by the jury, [citations omitted] ( , (1971), cert.
  • State v. Cox 464 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    1803 , 76 L.Ed.2d 367 (1983); , (1971), cert.
  • State v. Humphries 463 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
  • State v. Williams 458 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    623 , 1 L.Ed.2d 639 (1957); State v. Dotson, 260 La.471, (1971), (on rehearing), cert.
  • State v. Bailey 452 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1984
    In brief, the defendants argue that their allegation that the contraband was "planted" , (1971).
  • State v. Sweeney 443 So. 2d 522 La. 1983
  • State v. Mitchell 443 So. 2d 625 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • State v. Johnson 438 So. 2d 1221 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
    (1971), the court held, "To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Ester 436 So. 2d 543 La. 1983