DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Dotson, 256 So. 2d 594.

164 citing documents.

  • State v. Robinson 342 So. 2d 183 La. 1977
    State v. Russell, supra ; , (1971), cert.
  • State v. Kinchen 342 So. 2d 174 La. 1977
    State v. Batiste, supra; , (1971).
  • State v. Roche 341 So. 2d 348 La. 1976
  • State v. Wientjes 341 So. 2d 390 La. 1976
  • State v. Vincent 338 So. 2d 1376 La. 1976
  • State v. Miles 339 So. 2d 735 La. 1976
  • State v. Perkins 337 So. 2d 1145 La. 1976
  • State v. Overton 337 So. 2d 1201 La. 1976
  • State v. Owens 338 So. 2d 645 La. 1976
  • State v. Marks 337 So. 2d 1177 La. 1976
  • State v. Gallow 338 So. 2d 920 La. 1976
  • State v. Brown 337 So. 2d 484 La. 1976
    (1971), we stated: To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Henderson 337 So. 2d 204 La. 1976
  • State v. Dabon 337 So. 2d 502 La. 1976
    See: , (1971); Pugh, Louisiana Evidence Law 187-88 (1974).
  • State v. Flowers 337 So. 2d 469 La. 1976
  • State v. Russell 334 So. 2d 398 La. 1976
    (1971); State v. Greenbaum, 257 La.
  • State v. Randolph 334 So. 2d 687 La. 1976
    However, the identification of demonstrative evidence may be visual, , (1972), and connexity is ultimately a matter for the jury to decide so long as the evidence is shown to have some relevance which the trial judge considers sufficient to warrant its introduction, (La.
  • State v. Hill 332 So. 2d 475 La. 1976
  • State v. Jones 332 So. 2d 466 La. 1976
    (1971), we stated: To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Gordon 332 So. 2d 262 La. 1976
    (1974), we stated: To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Lockett 332 So. 2d 443 La. 1976
    The rule of law we have recognized, which applies here, is set forth in State v. *447 Dotson, , (1971), cert.
  • State v. Mims 330 So. 2d 905 La. 1976
    (1971), we stated: To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Keys 328 So. 2d 154 La. 1976
  • State v. Collins 328 So. 2d 674 La. 1976
  • State v. Demery 324 So. 2d 418 La. 1975
    The legal principles applicable to the introduction of demonstrative evidence are *420 , (1971), as follows: “To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Luneau 323 So. 2d 770 La. 1975
    State v. Howard, La., (1973); , (1971); State v. Graves, 259 La.
  • State v. Wolfe 321 So. 2d 335 La. 1975
    (1971), we stated: To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Brown 321 So. 2d 516 La. 1975
  • State v. McGhee 321 So. 2d 328 La. 1975
    (1971), we stated: To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. White 321 So. 2d 491 La. 1975
  • State v. Roach 322 So. 2d 222 La. 1975
    (1971), we stated: To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Drake 319 So. 2d 427 La. 1975
    (1971) to the same effect.
  • State v. Marcell 320 So. 2d 195 La. 1975
  • State v. Lemoine 319 So. 2d 911 La. 1975
    (1971), we held: “To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Bernard 320 So. 2d 159 La. 1975
    (1971); State v. Gladden, 260 La.
  • State v. Humphreys 319 So. 2d 344 La. 1975
  • State v. Batiste 318 So. 2d 27 La. 1975
    (1971), we held: To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Malmay 315 So. 2d 286 La. 1975
  • State v. Nance 315 So. 2d 695 La. 1975
    (1971), we held: "The law does not require that the evidence as to custody eliminate all possibility that the object has been altered.
  • State v. Mitchell 311 So. 2d 888 La. 1975
    (1971), this Court stated: "To admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.
  • State v. Sims 310 So. 2d 587 La. 1975
    (1971); State v. Hills, 259 La.
  • State v. Sibley 310 So. 2d 100 La. 1975
  • State v. Rhodes 308 So. 2d 770 La. 1975
  • State v. Jackson 309 So. 2d 318 La. 1975
    2d 519 (1973); , (1971).
  • State v. Santos 309 So. 2d 129 La. 1975
  • State v. Rowell 306 So. 2d 671 La. 1975
    (1972); State v. Sinclair, 258 La.
  • State v. Hayes 306 So. 2d 705 La. 1975
    735 , (1972); , (1971); State v. Wright, 254 La.
  • State v. Freeman 306 So. 2d 703 La. 1975
  • State v. Black 305 So. 2d 472 La. 1974
    1377 , 35 L.Ed.2d 581 , (1973); , (1971), cert.
  • State v. Prickett 305 So. 2d 509 La. 1974
    (1972) we announced the following standards to be applicable to the identification of demonstrative evidence : In order to admit demonstrative evidence at a trial, the law requires that the object be identified.