Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Chaney v. Travelers Insurance Company, 249 So. 2d 181.

57 citing documents.

Calvin J. Hill, Individually and as the of the Succession of Elnora Johnson Hill v. TMR Exploration, Inc., … La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2023
2d 859, 875 ( the term " work" in Article 667 includes not only constructions but also activities that may cause damage); - 15, 249 So.
Philip Cash, Glenda Cash, and Philip's Family Pharmacy, Inc. v. Delhi Office Building, LLC La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2019
Joey Higginbotham v. Usagencies Casualty Insurance Company,inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2018
Co., pp. 10-11, (1971) (wherein the supreme court concluded that the first circuit court of appeal had erroneously considered itself bound by a prior supreme court decision rendered by a plurality and explained, instead, that: “There is, in fact, no majority opinion by this Court … on the reasons fo
Kenner Plumbing Supply, Inc. v. Rusich Detailing, Inc. 175 So. 3d 479 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Co., , the Court held that under Article 667, a property owner is also responsible for the actions of his agents, contractors and representatives, who become solidarily liable with the owner.
Williams v. Library 111 So. 3d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
Marshall v. Air Liquide-Big Three, Inc. 107 So. 3d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2012
McGee v. Mutter 67 So. 3d 517 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
Yokum v. 615 Bourbon Street, LLC 977 So. 2d 859 La. 2008
Also in support of its decision, , (1971), [23] specifically finding that Chaney provided no authority for imposing liability under Louisiana Civil Code article 667 on the lessor-owner for the acts of the lessee because the lessee in the instant matter is not the agent, contractor, or representative of the lessor owner.
Yokum v. 615 Bourbon Street, LLC 960 So. 2d 1283 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2007
Co., , does not suggest otherwise.
Carr v. Oake Tree Apartments 786 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
Hunter v. Town of Sibley 745 So. 2d 820 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
We have previously referred to the Lombard decision which, , (1971), discussed the nature of liability under Article 667 as follows: Article 667 is therefore a limitation the law imposes upon the rights of proprietors in the use of their property.
Mossy Motors v. Sewerage and Water Bd. 753 So. 2d 269 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
502 , -32 (1968); , (1971); Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans
CITIZEN COMMITTEE v. City of Lafayette 685 So. 2d 289 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Ardoin v. State, Dept. of Transp. 679 So. 2d 928 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Schulker v. Roberson 676 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Schulker v. Roberson 676 So. 2d 684 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Inabnet v. Exxon Corp. 642 So. 2d 1243 La. 1994
Co., , (1971) (holding that a landowner was liable for damage to a neighbor caused by use of heavy equipment in canal improvements, although the work was done prudently by usual standards).
LeJeune v. Rayne Branch Hospital 539 So. 2d 849 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
Butler v. Baber 529 So. 2d 374 La. 1988
(1971), article 667 was found to be applicable to damage from construction incident to canal improvement by the parish.
Ursin v. New Orleans Aviation Bd. 506 So. 2d 947 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1987
(1971), the trial court had awarded the plaintiff damages for structural damage to his home caused by a contractor's work on behalf of the parish to enlarge a nearby drainage canal.
Elnaggar v. Fred H. Moran Const. Corp. 468 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
Barley v. State, Through State Dept. of Hwys. 463 So. 2d 689 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
Richoux v. Hebert 449 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
Caldwell Country Club v. Dept. of Transp. 438 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Acadian Heritage Realty v. City of Lafayette 434 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad 428 So. 2d 1136 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
Wetzka v. Big Three Industries, Inc. 409 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
(1971), the court stated it would not follow the majority decision of Reymond v. State Department of Highways, 255 La.
Stewart v. Sam Wallace Indus. Co. 409 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Androwski v. Ole McDonald's Farms, Inc. 407 So. 2d 455 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
Smith v. Town of Logansport 395 So. 2d 888 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
art. 667 liability was elaborated upon as follows: " , (1971), we recognized the rule to be applied to these cases as follows: `Article 667 is therefore a limitation the law imposes upon the rights of proprietors in the use of their property.
Acadian Heritage Realty, Inc. v. City of Lafayette 394 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Thornburg v. McMillin 392 So. 2d 1119 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Lanham v. Woodward, Wight & Co., Ltd. 386 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
Semon v. City of Shreveport 389 So. 2d 438 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1980
Keller v. Kelly 378 So. 2d 1006 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
Co., 1971, , , and Langlois v. Allied Chem.
Red River Realty, Inc. v. Relmm Corp. 372 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Russell v. Windsor Properties, Inc. 366 So. 2d 219 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
373 , (1957); , (1971); ) or whether defendants' liability to plaintiff is founded upon the strict liability of a proprietor under LSA-C.C.
Easterly v. Carr 361 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
Charia v. Stanley 359 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
District Judge Fedoroff agreed with the Commissioner on the issue of negligence, but determined that the owner was not liable, , (La.
Joubert v. STATE THROUGH STATE PARK, ETC. 345 So. 2d 220 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Dean v. Hercules Incorporated 328 So. 2d 69 La. 1976
Loescher v. Parr 324 So. 2d 441 La. 1975
Breaux v. Rimmer & Garrett, Inc. 320 So. 2d 214 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
(1971) which we do not, however, find applicable.
Loescher v. Parr 312 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
Holland v. Keaveney 306 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
425 , (1970); , (1971); Langlois v. Allied Chemical, supra.
Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc. 310 So. 2d 93 La. 1975
Young v. Louisiana Department of Highways 301 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
One of the dissenting justices considered as dicta the discussion of Article 667, while another considered that the language relative to Article 667 “unsettles the prior jurisprudence construing this Article.” , (1971) the property owner was allowed recovery against the parish of East Baton Rouge for damages to his property resulting from actions by the contractor while improving a street and the parish was granted indemnification against the contractor under a “hold harmless” clause in its cont
Picou v. Highlands Insurance 298 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Mut v. Newark Insurance Company 289 So. 2d 237 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
425 , , , , imposes strict liability in tort upon a landowner for damages resulting to a neighbor from works erected or maintained upon the landowner's property.
Distinguished State v. Barnard 287 So. 2d 770 La. 1973