Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Langlois v. Allied Chemical Corporation, 249 So. 2d 133.

224 citing documents.

  • McInnis v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company 322 So. 2d 155 La. 1975
    (1971): The determination of whether a plaintiff has assumed a risk is made by subjective inquiry, whereas contributory negligence is determined objectively under the reasonable man standard.
  • Simmons v. Beauregard Parish School Board 315 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1971); Dewese v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., Cooksey v. Central Louisiana Electric Co., Inc.
  • Dean v. Hercules, Inc. 314 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    We further note, however, , (1971), it was said: "As recently as 1968 in Craig v. Montelepre Realty Co., 252 La.
  • Cates v. BEAUREGARD ELECETRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. 316 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1971), where the court stated that generally a determination of whether a plaintiff has assumed a risk is made by subjective inquiry, whereas contributory negligence is determined objectively under the reasonable man standard.
  • Holland v. Keaveney 306 So. 2d 838 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1975
    art. 667, art. 669 [1] and art. 2315; D'Albora v. Tulane University, supra, , (1971).
  • Perry v. Godchaux's Department Store 311 So. 2d 598 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Hero Lands Company v. Texaco, Inc. 310 So. 2d 93 La. 1975
  • Pollard v. Roberts 306 So. 2d 801 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
    Assumption of risk is a defense to strict liability in Louisiana, , (1971), but the trial judge correctly rejected it in this case.
  • Mixon v. Allstate Insurance Company 300 So. 2d 232 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    See: , (1971); Theunissen v. Guidry, 244 La.
  • Distinguished Richmond v. EMPLOYERS'FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 298 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Dewese v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 295 So. 2d 574 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    (1971), as follows: "Usually, the assumption of risk doctrine will apply where the nature of the relationship of the parties appears to exact consent from the one injured to be exposed to possible harm.
  • Pagitt Well Service, Inc. v. Sam Broussard, Inc. 293 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
  • Mudd v. Travelers Indemnity Company 295 So. 2d 540 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
  • Pfister v. Phoenix of Hartford Insurance Company 290 So. 2d 362 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Plaintiff relies principally on Chaney v. Brupbacher, La.App., ; , ; Hall v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co., La.App., ; and Boure v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App., , to refute the contributory negligence.
  • Simmons v. Hernandez 287 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    *642 , (1971), wherein Justice Barham indicated that in strict liability situations negligence is not an ingredient of fault, nor is contributory negligence a defense.
  • Lombard v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 284 So. 2d 905 La. 1973
    425 , (1970); , (1971), in concurrence in Chaney v. Travelers Insurance Company, 259 La.
  • Simon v. Ford Motor Company 282 So. 2d 126 La. 1973
    Further, I believe that even if the owner is liable only because of "negligence" (as contrasted with the broader liability for "fault" imposed by the Civil Code, cf., , ), then this owner-operator, the defendant Ferrington, has not absolved himself from negligence, as required by our jurisprudential rule, when his vehicle veers over into another lane and strikes and injures one lawfully and blamelessly there.
  • Weiland v. King 281 So. 2d 688 La. 1973
    (1971); Stone, Tort Doctrine in Louisiana: The Concept of Fault, 27 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Salter v. BWS Corporation, Inc. 281 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    [7] , (footnote 12) (1971).
  • Smolinski v. Taulli 276 So. 2d 286 La. 1973
    See: , (1971); Theunissen v. Guidry, 244 La.
  • Allstate Insurance Co. v. Town of Ville Platte 269 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    (1971), where the claimant sustained injuries when he inhaled a highly poisonous gas known as "antimony pentachloride."
  • Theriot v. Transit Casualty Co. 267 So. 2d 211 La. 1972
    this court expanded the "fault" concept and categorically held that "fault" as defined in Articles 2315 and 2316 included acts and omissions other than those defined as negligent.
  • Boudreaux v. American Insurance Company 264 So. 2d 621 La. 1972
    (1971); Chaney v. Travelers Insurance Co., 259 La.
  • Union Federal Savings & Loan v. 451 Florida Corp. 256 So. 2d 356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    4 Cir. (1967); , (1971).